Well I've worked at a supermarket and I loved my job. It was the first time I had an employer who was not trying to take me to bed or make double-meaning remarks. The customers were really lovely, they got to know you and queue at your till. There were of course one or two odd ones who made you unhappy but the majority of people were really nice. We also got excellent training which helped us with our job and we were treated equally by the managers (e.g. one Christmas a supervisor tricked me to use turkey vouchers for things other than turkey and when I went to use mine they said I could not use them so I referred the matter to the Manager and she determined that I could use my voucher being single and having no use for a big turkey but she did explain that they were making me a favour and of course that what my supervisor had done was wrong in the first place). You can't get fairer than that.
I don't know how much things may have changed in the years since I was a checkout girl and how much less enjoyable working at a supermarket may be but surely if one does their job with enthusiasm and pride and puts customers first, one cannot go wrong.
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Tania
Over 90 days ago
Straight Female, 60
0 miles · Greater London
Forum
Quote by pjolloper
But the majority of women seem to be of larger breast size. aaa, aa a and b cups seem to be in the minority. Perhaps its that the dd owners are prouder of their assets, in which case Here's a cheer for the small, sensitive and eminently suckable :inlove:
Sincerely pjollop (they used to call me 'outspan man' after their advert which proclaimed 'small ones are jucier!')
or closet homosexual?
My pet peeve with supermarkets is that the cashier will bag one or two items then throw you the bags to do your own bagging. This is after all the advertising about them doing the bagging for you. I would normally not mind but due to having a disability, bagging and carrying things is difficult for me.
Quote by Jas-Tim
So if she was on her own there were no eye witnesses to the event.
Sounds like media crap to me, she was a bloody brilliant media manipulater I'll give her that.
Jas
XXX
Oh dear! Do you really believe Diana would be totally alone anywhere in the world? No servants? No cook? No chauffeur? No secretary?
Quote by WibblyWobbly
Call me a cynic but it seems to me that allowing herself to be filmed on Xmas Day in this manner is so flippin' manipulative it's not true.
This was a film, not a documentary. A film that was made AFTER her death based on eyewitness reports about her character and events in her life.
Quote by Shireen_Mids
Isn't it funny that whilst there are alot of people who are "defending" Diana, her sons stood beside their father yesterday and looked genuinly pleased and happy..... If they can be happy for him despite the fact that it was their mother that was wronged then why cant the general public.
Shireen
The boys were young when their mother was killed. They would have naturally latched on to their father at that difficult time in their lives. Time heals and time blurs memories. And whatever their personal feelings towards their stepmom are, William and Harry are clever enough not to show them in public. Also I don't think Diana was the kind of person who would have complained to her kids about their dad's shenanigans so there is probably a lot that they do not know or choose to ignore.
There was a good film about Diana's life after the split up with Charles. In it there is a scene. It is Christmas and she is all alone and unhappy. But when she rings her kids, she has music playing in the background and pretends that she is having a fabulous time celebrating with friends. I was very touched by that scene because I believe it truly captured the essence of Diana - a truly selfless person who loved her children to bits.
The public cannot and will not forget how this woman was wronged. Consequently whatever Charles does will always be met with disapproval. After all heaven and hell are here on earth...
The Queen singing the national anthem would be as silly as someone singing at his own birthday... 'happy birthday to me... happy birthday to me...'
Now about that comment about Prince Harry... have I missed out on some gossip? Who is thought to be the father? I always thought he took after the Spencers.
And did anyone notice the comment about Charles and Camilla being very old people when their turn comes to ascend to the throne? LOL I personally would have taken my hat off to Charles if he were to abdicate the throne as a penance - a real one, not just a few words put together by a publicist to appease the crowds reg. his and Camilla's unfaithfulness. If she really loves him, she will love him without the crown on his head...
Now I am waiting to see how things go in the Palace. It was easy for Phillip to bully Diana but it will be near impossible to intimidate Camilla when there is less of an age gap between them and she is so worldly-wise.
As for Tara and drugs, she looked too good to be still on the habit. She looked fresh, vibrant and full of life; self assured and aware. I do wish her the best.
Now about that comment about Prince Harry... have I missed out on some gossip? Who is thought to be the father? I always thought he took after the Spencers.
And did anyone notice the comment about Charles and Camilla being very old people when their turn comes to ascend to the throne? LOL I personally would have taken my hat off to Charles if he were to abdicate the throne as a penance - a real one, not just a few words put together by a publicist to appease the crowds reg. his and Camilla's unfaithfulness. If she really loves him, she will love him without the crown on his head...
Now I am waiting to see how things go in the Palace. It was easy for Phillip to bully Diana but it will be near impossible to intimidate Camilla when there is less of an age gap between them and she is so worldly-wise.
As for Tara and drugs, she looked too good to be still on the habit. She looked fresh, vibrant and full of life; self assured and aware. I do wish her the best.
What were your thoughts on the Royal Wedding? I don't have any particular feelings other than surprise to see Prince William losing his hair (obviously he inherited that bit from his dad) on the top of his head. Also what are all these posh people thinking of appearing in public in such unbecoming frocks? Is A-line back in fashion along with a 60s look? Thank God for Joanna Lumley and Tara Palmer-Tomkinson adding a bit of grace, overshadowing the royal females even! Over to you now.
As far as I can tell, OKwas just talking about his sexual experiences with his wife. They tried using condoms, they did not enjoy them and he is just wondering how others cope with their use. He has nowhere said that he is not using them NOW or will not be using them in the future if the opportunity for a sexual encounter were to arise.
As for the lucky member who went with 3girlsand noted their sharingof dildoeswithout using fresh condoms on them, he is right - that is very risky and stupid. And of course if asked most people will say that they do not consider oral sex without a barrier to be risky but we know it is and it is just a case of playing russian roulette. Who is the bullet going to hit? On this basis alone I would not trust any partner, no matter how much I loved him and how long we had been together, because in the heat of things it is possible to forget to take precautions, as in people's mind the risk of getting infected via oral sex is minimal and not worth considering.
I still recall with fear the time I had sex with my ex. We used gloves and condoms but he let me give him a BJ without a condom. Knowing that he is very meticulous about not having unprotected sex, I felt safe to do so. However, minutes after we were done and upon casual conversation, he revealled that he took no protection with his current g/f because - wait for it! - she was sterilised and there was no need. I reminded him the risk of catching STDs and he laughed telling me she works at a hospital and is safe. I argued that hospitals do not screen people for STDs, especially office workers and pointed out that his logic was flawed. He stuck up his lips and said that he trusted her 100% and I had no reason to worry and I should drop the subject. Maybe a month later or so he rang me very upset to say that he had been fixing up her PC and came upon pics of her having unprotected sex with various males and females. The pics were only a few months old. So much for trust, eh?
As for the lucky member who went with 3girlsand noted their sharingof dildoeswithout using fresh condoms on them, he is right - that is very risky and stupid. And of course if asked most people will say that they do not consider oral sex without a barrier to be risky but we know it is and it is just a case of playing russian roulette. Who is the bullet going to hit? On this basis alone I would not trust any partner, no matter how much I loved him and how long we had been together, because in the heat of things it is possible to forget to take precautions, as in people's mind the risk of getting infected via oral sex is minimal and not worth considering.
I still recall with fear the time I had sex with my ex. We used gloves and condoms but he let me give him a BJ without a condom. Knowing that he is very meticulous about not having unprotected sex, I felt safe to do so. However, minutes after we were done and upon casual conversation, he revealled that he took no protection with his current g/f because - wait for it! - she was sterilised and there was no need.
I reminded him the risk of catching STDs and he laughed telling me she works at a hospital and is safe. I argued that hospitals do not screen people for STDs, especially office workers and pointed out that his logic was flawed. He stuck up his lips and said that he trusted her 100% and I had no reason to worry and I should drop the subject. Maybe a month later or so he rang me very upset to say that he had been fixing up her PC and came upon pics of her having unprotected sex with various males and females. The pics were only a few months old. So much for trust, eh? Quote by alspals
...having become addicted to the C4 programme, I'd like to know...what would you do if you could get away with being 10 years younger, with the knowledge you have now??...I'd probably have bought shares in La Chambre!!
If I looked 10 years younger I would entice a lot of older men by pretending to be a lot less knowledgeful about life and sex than I really am. Heheheh!
I think I am going to write a short story about an intro to pee play!!! I feel inspired. 
Stay tuned folks!
I wrote the story and submitted it. It is titled 'The Reluctant Model'. Should appear in a day or two depending on the amount of stories waiting to be approved. Please PM me your comments guys. Thanks.
Stay tuned folks!I wrote the story and submitted it. It is titled 'The Reluctant Model'. Should appear in a day or two depending on the amount of stories waiting to be approved. Please PM me your comments guys. Thanks.
Quote by O. K.
in the old days, my ex-wife and I tried condoms, but we never able to get on with them, as they were painfull to her due to wrinkling and I could not purchase one that was big enough to fit me, plus they always came off during intercourse. Personally, I have always preferred sex without the discomfort of a rubber and my ex- liked to ride it bareback.
Erm, sounds like you are contradicting yourself. If you are too big, condoms should fit very snuggly and not come off easily. Also they would not wrinkle, unless of course you are just 2 inches long in which case...
As others have pointed out, condoms are a necessity in our age and time. Going bareback is not an option, even among couples. You can never be 100% sure of anything in life, much less the fidelity of your partner.
OK I found some links. I was wrong about the country. It was not Angola but Rwanda. There were about 250,000 women by soldiers about a decade ago. Of those that survived, 70% were infected with HIV. Do some simple multiplication... infected women + non infected men, infected women > infected babies. Don't think the Pope had anything to do with this.
Here are some links:
Here are some links:
As Rwanda marks the 10th anniversary of the butchering of almost a million Tutsis and moderate Hutus, activists are calling on rich countries to fund free antiretroviral treatments (ART) for women and girls infected with HIV/AIDS in the genocide.
Hutu ringleaders extorted militiamen to Tutsi women in a deliberate plan to use AIDS as a weapon that could go on killing long after they had murdered their other victims with clubs and machetes.
Massacres also led to HIV infection as survivors hidden under body piles had their wounds exposed to others’ blood.
Veejay
The spread of AIDS in Africa was a criminal act of soldiers infected with HIV one woman after the other, haven't you heard? The people there did not know AIDS before that but they will be suffering for many years to come because of that. I am not sure exactly which army did which to which civilians but the name Angola springs to mind off hand, I might be wrong, but I am sure someone else on this forum will remember and clarify who it was.
The Church never told people to go and and infect others. Let us not make this into a religious battle.
The spread of AIDS in Africa was a criminal act of soldiers infected with HIV one woman after the other, haven't you heard? The people there did not know AIDS before that but they will be suffering for many years to come because of that. I am not sure exactly which army did which to which civilians but the name Angola springs to mind off hand, I might be wrong, but I am sure someone else on this forum will remember and clarify who it was.
The Church never told people to go and and infect others. Let us not make this into a religious battle.
Actually the opposite of things is the thing itself with the word 'not' added in the front (elementary Logic class at school).
So it is dark or not dark
It is cold or not cold
It is great or not great
and so on...
Therefore the opposite of opposite is clearly: not opposite!
Glad to have helped!
So it is dark or not dark
It is cold or not cold
It is great or not great
and so on...
Therefore the opposite of opposite is clearly: not opposite!
Glad to have helped!
I've been to the London Erotica twice. The first year it was too packed and we were pushed and shoved, there was no place to rest one's feet, huge queues at the bars and so on. They had a good show of old-fashioned strip tease (complete with the feather fans) which was a turn-on but when they got on to the modern stuff it was a disaster.
The second year we went, the exhibition was much quieter and easy to browse, we gave the shows a miss but went to the lecture instead (so as to rest our legs!) Did not bother with food and drinks and made a quick exit after we had seen what we wanted.
Someone told us that the Skin II Expo was far better and indeed it was. Smaller venue, good choice of stalls and a nice little restaurant upstairs with lots of seats. Plus easy parking at the Barbican instead of fighting for parking space at the Erotica.
I personally believe the Erotica is much of a muchness - seen it once, you've seen it all. And it was unkind of the organisers to blame the Northerners for its failure.
The second year we went, the exhibition was much quieter and easy to browse, we gave the shows a miss but went to the lecture instead (so as to rest our legs!) Did not bother with food and drinks and made a quick exit after we had seen what we wanted.
Someone told us that the Skin II Expo was far better and indeed it was. Smaller venue, good choice of stalls and a nice little restaurant upstairs with lots of seats. Plus easy parking at the Barbican instead of fighting for parking space at the Erotica.
I personally believe the Erotica is much of a muchness - seen it once, you've seen it all. And it was unkind of the organisers to blame the Northerners for its failure.
