Quote by freckledbird
She is Alspals - theres another one. Asterisk - ta daaaaa.
..good luck Bev :thumbup:

Quote by blonde
Did someone call my name ???? lol
I've missed you lot too !!!!
Quote by fabio grooverider
great thread idea Vix.
Not seen Blonde post for ages.. Fabio & Dewi don't seem as prolific as they used to be.:cry:
Quote by Ice Pie
..seems Eric has a point..looks like girls love a dude, who has a way with words and can properly conjugate his verbs (amongst other things!)![]()
Quote by Eric not Derek
Thank you vix.
Although you may not agree with everything I have said, you alone seem to have acknowledged that compatibility runs deep and even something as seemingly trivial as correct (or near correct) grammar can matter.
I asked a simple and valid question, perhaps in an ungainly manner, but have been vilified.
Lighten up people!
Quote by davej
Sorry for being crude but has anyone tried it or would consider having it done (including men)? :shock:![]()
![]()
:twisted:
Joke, "Do Ya Think My Anal is Sexy?"
Quote by Eric not Derek
Well, that certainly woke you up. There seem to be three main points.
a) That I disappeared. For a start, I live in a different time zone, so may well be asleep when you are awake. Also, I do have other things to do.
Quote by McCloggie
Really weird!!!
I put in The Waterboys (as it was the first CD I happened to look at) at it came up with Leo Kottke - a little known but brilliant american acustic guitar player - whose CD I have sitting right next to The Waterboys. :shock:
McC
Quote by tall_dark_n_havesome
Wanting to have sex is the most natural thing in the is what we are conditioned for, just as we are conditioned to eat. Over the millenia the influence of society has laid down mores in order to protect societies. In order to have a stable society it was found that children needed a stable base. Also men are natuturally territorial , thus the exclusivity of a woman, (or women as in some societies ) became a symbol of that territorial power. Each individual could also have his own territory as wives became chattels. As religions became a dominant factor, these sociological unions were promoted. Christian societies gradually freed the female from being a chattel, but the payback was the promotion of the monogomous couple and the suppression of the natural sex drive to a means of reproduction, albeit a loving one. For centuries the most educated people in society were the clerics, preaching to the lesser educated masses. In the twentieth century the masses became eductaed, and began to challenge the Christian mores. Thus throughout the twentieth century we saw the gradual breakdownof these doctrines of sex. Sex before marriage, contraception, abortion, teenage sex. homosexuality all became accepted as normal. Society has begun to reclaim its sexual intellect. The main problem now however is not the Church, albeit it still has a strong voice over many, but the media, who on the pretext of liberalism, lavish in hypcrisy and sleaze, perpetuating the idea that sex is actually wrong by the production of salacious exposes to sell papers. As the 21st century progresses more and more people are experimenting with their sexuality, but on a more educated basis Sites like this one demonstrate that there are many many people who can have a loving and faithful relationship, but also a sexually open one. For every open liberated couple in here, there are 10 others on the verge of swinging, being held back by guilt, ignorance or the fact that one party is not interested. My prediction is that before 2025 swinging will be considerd as normal as sex out of marriage is considered today. ....just my opinion!
Quote by fabio grooverider
sorry for the hi-jack NN.. but i have to address something...
..happened to me too...but they thought I was Fabio! :shock: :doh:![]()
Quote by bucksfuncpl
This has been a most interesting and erudite thread and one that I think should be returned to as the legislation goes through its various processes. I have worried, however, at BFC's comments. Where I have been coming from is not to do with censorship of adult-consenting porn and sexual activity (heaven forbid - I was at Chams yesterday indulging in all sorts and having a very good time!), but where porn is used deliberately to exploit. Whether this be by adults exposing kids to porn via internet/photo images/ magazines etc, or, as I pointed out previously the trade in 'sex slaves'. As Alspals quite rightly comment, the wider community has to take an interest in kids who have been abused because their abusers - often parents - don't care whether they are exposed to porn (most likely promoting it!). People need to realise that this goes on and somewhere along the line, be involved in preventing this activity from continuing. Whether we are parents or not, we all have a responsibility!
Mod edit: no need to start a new thread - threads merged.
Quote by northwest-cpl
That NEARLY put me off me chips !