Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
alspals
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 65
0 miles · South Yorkshire

Forum

he certainly has a way with words...but it certainly beats sucking some badcock!!
lol lol lol
...twice read the thread title as 'where would you like to have your sashes battered?'
It's been a long day!
:doh: :silly:
Quote by longhandle8
IT's ok to openly riducule TV's CD's etc but would it have been acceptable if someone had made a joke that a black person would sell more big issues in Brixton for example !

...well if it were funny and in context I would lmao!
lol lol lol
Quote by celticq
I've got a good idea - well it started off as a good idea and now its starting to get a bit messy in the kitchen!!!!!
In the meantime of got my own version of
Fabio Grooverider - Cheers Sean lol

..crikey..you make Sean look like a barrister with that white wig on his head!!
lol lol lol lol
Quote by The Shadow
You own a Telecom's company!!!

I also have a 25% share in a telco, is it that unusual ???
...forgive me, but do we really need to know? confused confused
Quote by polly40
So, if eating pineapple makes your cum taste of pineapple, why do some mens dicks taste of cheese????? Is this the same sort of thing????
Bustylady40 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

..with the addition of a little sweetcorn..you could have a delicious 'dick pizza'..uughhh! :evil2:
I heard that if you eat a lot o pineapples it makes your spunk taste of them.
quote]
Honeynut Loops..let's loop together...
Quote by Scandal
All people are rec % similar genetically to each other ( and 99% similar to chimpanzees)

..can you ride tandem??!
lol lol lol lol
....I'm now boz-eyed!!
:silly:
Ps..if yr being serious I don't know and have never seen any black folks with blue eyes..although I have seen some blue eyed mixed race people.
..poor you KcKat...but it could've been worse if you'd been using the strap on on him at the time :shock: :shock:
lol lol lol
Quote by Jiggle
i personally think it was rushed!.... i think it needed more time showing him crossing into the dark side!
Jiggle

..aye Jiggle, spent my life trying to get girls to cross over into the 'Dark Side'! redface
lol lol lol lol lol lol
Quote by Fred aka Medic 1
So pussies do have teeth lol lol lol lol

..blimey, a woman who really does have a mantrap for a pussy :shock: :shock:
lol lol lol lol
Quote by SXBOY
ALSPALS
all i was trying to get across ,racism aside which is in excusable,
that looking at africa as a whole its been let down on all sides
sorry if i did not quiet nail it...

no worries sxboy...guess we're all getting a little over sensitive over semantics on this thread..when can we start talking about shagging again?!!
lol lol lol
Quote by SXBOY
MY oh my what a debate
when your in a hole stop digging
i think so many good points are raised by so many in this thread
the many suffer through the greed of so few
the church has some blame ...and before anyone starts i am not religous in the slightest
and whilst on the subject of rasism the man in charge of zimbabwe aint been to slow in coming forward against the whites
Africa needs to evolve from what it has become ...thats ALL parties,colours ,creeds and believes
and try to rebuild ,add infostructures ,learn to police itself moral and physically and give a lovely continent a chance....before its too late

..I don't think anyone disagrees with what you say Sxboy, but your comments aren't relevant to what was said about 3rd world immigrants being largely responsible for bringing AIDS into the UK...there are racists of all complexions, especially Mugabe, but that doesn't justify anyone else behaving like him.
smile smile
Quote by Sgt Bilko
I notice in Lets Meet Up there are Wank Clubs for Stoke, Glasgow and Suffolk, but what about Manchester?? Can't we have a Wank Club??? confused confused confused
Oh yes, we do have one after all - Manchester City !!!! lol lol lol lol lol wink
Right - Nobody mention last Saturday!!! confused confused wink

:laughabove: :laughabove:
Quote by Jags

..you may be right, but whatever Judy's motivation, he has chosen to not continue participating in this thread, so it may be unfair to 'second guess' his objectives.
smile

Objective?? Just to sweep through with an 'alternative' view designed to offend and then bugger off and not bother defending his position?? Alternative does not mean the same as bigotted, surely?
Just cos he's chosen not to continue participating doesn't mean that the post should go unheeded. Questions go unanswered.
:twisted:
..er Jags maybe you didnt see my other contributions to this thread?
I was not suggesting that Judy's post should go unheeded, I was responding to Happycats theory about why Judy had posted what he did!
Quote by Happy Cats
I have read Judys post and thought it through the best I can. I believe it is important to try to work out the motivation behind the post.
Essentially he was saying that the spread of Aids is due to foreigners. Now, what might be the public perception of who is to blame for aids? It could be that a lot of people feel it is due to gay men. This might be accurate or not, it doesn’t really matter in this case, it is what a lot of people think.
What is Judy? I guess amongst other things, a gay/bi man. Perhaps Judy feels defensive when the issue of Aids comes up because he could be labeled as being part of a community that some people feel are to blame.
I don’t believe Judy is racist, I believe the motivation behind the post was not racism but something different. It might have been a subconscious attempt to defend himself.
This is a theory and may be completely off beam, but a different way of looking at things

..you may be right, but whatever Judy's motivation, he has chosen to not continue participating in this thread, so it may be unfair to 'second guess' his objectives.
smile
Quote by Jags
Now I know more about some people than I really wanted to - thanks pierced Jon!!
:shock: :shock:

..you also found out that unlike most male 3rd world immigrants...I don't have a 10" willy!! lol lol
Great thread, what happened to Traffic, who started it..and Judy?!! Come back all's forgiven!
Quote by Silk and Big G
This is exactly the kind of thing im talking about . Ive read Judys post , and whilst it may have pulled no punches in her opinions it certainly never said third world countries were " solely" to blame . A 'liberal' attitude reads it as that because they arent reading the whole opnion , they are already cherry picking for potential incorrectness. No Judys post isnt the only one apportioning blame , most of the posts refuting her are actively blaming our complacency and attitude and turning the blame on ourselves rather than any poor third world individuals . The virus spreads because of everyones complacency and its very difficult to go on using the ignorance arguament decade after decade . I would suggest that if you are informed enough to travel half way across the world to a foreign country to set up home , chances are youre informed enough to wear a condom .
Once again blame is not relevant morally , but if we are going to contain and try and treat the problem we have to start somewhere . As I read Judes post the suggestions although not subtle seemed to say that it would be impossible to contain our own problem if we continued to import it unabated , and that is simply true . Similarly although ive seen repeated reference to one paragraph of her post regarding the genesis of the virus , I have seen not one response to the other very sensible comments in it about behaviour and attitudes in our community . Thats what I mean by liberal , picking out the thing you find offensive just for the sake of it , and ignoring the rest of the comment - which unfortunately leads to missing the discussion that is most pertinent.

...before I run and join smokerJim down the local...I hear what you say Silk & Big G, but unfortunately Judy's post was devalued by the sensational remarks she made about 3rd world immigrants..it was almost as invalid saying 'eating chicken biriani could give you AIDS because it's likely to have come into contact with a 3rd world immigrant'! The 3rd World argument is an academic one, but of course this kind of language has wider appeal to racists and xenophobes, who can use it to there own advantage (I'm not including you or anyone else I've encountered on this site in that btw!)..it's almost as spurious as saying 'all black men have got big cocks'...something I know isnt true .....from personal experience, sadly! lol
Quote by Silk and Big G
Its the usual thing , and part of the problem is all the f8%cking nancying around caused by appotioning blame . In fact I agree wholeheartedly with Jags and the self protection angle , equally the self protection arguament applies to so called ' third world' peoples .
My point earlier was really voicing my frustration at the way racism and bigotry issues are waved in our faces every time we try to discuss a subject which is the concern of the whole of mankind . Youre all welcome to read my previous posts and dissect them for racism or bigotry , you wont find any . What I was alluding to is the the sad fact that the realities of the situation had once again began to be watered down by the introduction of political correctness . I stated no facts , dates or figures simply that because a discussion about a pandemic includes some reference to national incidence and prevalence it doesnt make it racist . Theres no use spending ages trying to apportion blame and even more sickeningly trying to assume blame ourselves lest we are terrible enough to suggest someone else may have been instrumental . The virus is here now and we have to deal with it . I for one dont see screening of some form as a bad part of a whole world approach whatever bloody country we come from . Im happy to be screened and if i was then id expect anyone poorer or richer to do the same . If it helped stop the spread of the virus .
Anyway ...........................

..the only person seeking to apportion blame was advocating a negative view about 'one' section' of the population. No-one is trying to stifle informed debate about anything, and nor am I shy of discussing it, because it inflames my sensitivities..why is it that liberal views are humiliated by being seen as 'nancying around' or political correctness...it's just common sense surely!
If someone could confirm that the AIDS epidemic was due solely to 3rd world immigration then I would support blanket testing and gun towers at Dover..it's just that in the heat of debate the easy targets get hammered and folks stop looking for the really productive answers to this world-wide problem. To illustrate the point, if all 3rd world immigration stopped, would the UK HIV rate decline?..probably not, cos all the people that believed that 'Africans started it' would get complacent and go round shagging unprotected again.
Quote by Steve_Mids

We need to check everyone we let into the country for aids?
:

Sorry to butcher your post to one line Dawn but its the one line that I am interested in.
Not only do I think we should check for Aids/HIV but for all the other nasties...i.e Polio,TB etc etc...
No matter where people come from they should be screaned before entering..
Its no good teaching our own to be carefull etc when we are happily letting people in who are carriers of all manner of nasty diseases to spread their own particular disease with gay abandon....
Bit like pissing into the wind really innit confused: confused: confused:
..sounds like an island utopia Steve, screening everyone before they enter the UK? Who's going to pay for it?
It would obviously have to come out of the taxpayers pocket..Same as the costs of running all the half way houses we operate for imigrants who have travelled half way across Europe to claim asylum.
Would you include tourists coming to/returning to these shores? Where would you hold people pending the outcome of their tests...sounds like a financial and logistical nightmare!!
All the folks that have travelled from hundreds/thousands of miles through 2 or 3 or more countries to get here should be returned to the first country they encountered after leaving their home country and made to apply for asylum there..I know its a great pity what is happening to many thousands of people across the world but why should we have to home them and support them?..
As for the tourist element then I suppose yes they would have to be tested as well...Or at least tested for diseases that are dominant in the country they have visited.
Ps: how would you define 'our own'?, many of them are part of the problem.
I see what you are saying here and there is not a lot we can do about that particular problem aside from keep plugging away and educating people...
I just know that folks are gonna flame me for what I have written but it is about time we started to get tough andstop the torrents of people coming into this country no matter where they come from...
The country is gonna break under the strain before much longer and its got to stop.

Edited cause I still cant get the hang of the muliple quote while inserting my own text thingy
I'm speechless! :shock: :shock: :shock:
Quote by Silk and Big G
You cant ?
30 years ago did we have a problem with HIV in the UK ?
Did all the major intitutes of communicable diseases world wide not trace the first diagnosable cases of it mainly on the African continent ?
Have we not in the past had many many immigrants enter the country suffering from the virus ?
Youre right of course the thread isnt about political correctness , but neither is it about racism .

Was the first case of AIDS traced to the African continent? If so, so what? That doesn't help us with the problem we have now, as it does not illustrate that the African problem is any better or worse than ours, nor that African immigrants brought it over here.
Sure, many immigrants have come into the UK with AIDS, but many Brits have left without it and come back with it...irrespective of what part of the world they have been visiting and I guess many Brits have also infected people from other countries whilst visiting.
Quote by Steve_Mids

We need to check everyone we let into the country for aids?
:

Sorry to butcher your post to one line Dawn but its the one line that I am interested in.
Not only do I think we should check for Aids/HIV but for all the other nasties...i.e Polio,TB etc etc...
No matter where people come from they should be screaned before entering..
Its no good teaching our own to be carefull etc when we are happily letting people in who are carriers of all manner of nasty diseases to spread their own particular disease with gay abandon....
Bit like pissing into the wind really innit confused: confused: confused:
..sounds like an island utopia Steve, screening everyone before they enter the UK? Who's going to pay for it? Would you include tourists coming to/returning to these shores? Where would you hold people pending the outcome of their tests...sounds like a financial and logistical nightmare!!
Ps: how would you define 'our own'?, many of them are part of the problem.
Quote by Jags
But you could argue that if you were going to, say Thailand, for sex the thought that you would be tested for HIV on the way back in might act as a deterant against going. Or at the very least make you think about safe sex.
J & S

Surely the thought of dying a very slow and nasty death should be the deterrent here. Why should the government act as the nanny. You have to know that if you have unprotected sexual contact with a professional sex worker, here or abroad, that you are putting yourself bang right in the middle of the high-risk area. It's nothing to do with colour of skin or the language you speak, it's all to do with stupidity.
Until about 15- 20 years ago knowledge of HIV wasn't so widespread and people did die of ignorance. There is no excuse now. We teach safe sex in schools. Condoms are free from Family Planning Clinics.
We are lucky in this country. To blame the poor and the down-trodden and the supressed is unforgivable.
:shock:
..you hit the nail on the head there Jags..Aids is about stupid straight people, stupid gays, stupid Africans, stupid Jamaicans, stupid English, stupid Amercans, stupid Germans, stupid teenagers, stupid swingers, stupidity everywhere..I have to confess to having been stupid in the past myself (as I'm sure we all have) and fortunatley got away with it..but in any event I wouldn't have been seeking to blame a bunch of poor, illiterate immigrants for my plight, if I'd not been so lucky.
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
We wanted to stay out of the fray, but had to re-enter.
The way we read Judy's post. Judy was saying that people from certain areas of the world were more likely to bring in HIV than people from other parts of the world. Therefore to prevent the HIV rate in UK increasing there should be testing of the people from the high risk areas.
Are we wrong in that sumation? If so can someone give their view of what Judy was saying.
Assuming we were correct in our definition;
In Angola today, there is an outbreak of Marburg virus, very similar to Ebola. 93% mortality rate. But many, many more times as infectious than HIV. You get it, you usually die in three days or so, in the worst way imaginable. Now if the W.H.O. can't contain it and it spreads thro Angola should the UK ban people from Angola coming to the UK. The incubation period is a few days by the way. Or to put it another way, you could catch it in Angola, be OK on the flight to Heathrow and fall ill one day later in Manchester or anywhere.
If you say yes, to protect the people of UK the Gov should stop people from Angola (the high risk area) coming here then are you a racist?
J & S

..of course when seeking a solution to our domestic HIV problem, the consequences of mass immigration from high risk areas should be considered. But there are many causes for the increase of HIV infection in the UK and 3rd world immigration is probably a small element in this.
Please excuse my flippancy, but how many immigrants from high risk areas actually come into the UK every year and does every Nigerian/Jamaican want to drag away some poor unsuspecting Brit to have unprotected sex with them?? (Maybe better not to ponder too much on that one!)
The number one offender surely has to be our own (continuing) complacency in new sexual liaisons. The way I read Judy's post, it seemed to particularly implicate 3rd world immigrants for our domestic AIDS situation.
Quote by da69ve

30 years ago we didn't have an AIDS problem in the UK, in fact we didn't have AIDS or HIV at all, it was as rare as rocking horse poo. It was brought into this country from the third world and those third world people are still bringing it in.
Judy............... .............Always supporting the fight against unsafe sex and a lack of education

Going through Judy's first post .....this bit did stand out as racist and misleading.
I'm sorry Judy, but I have to agree with Dave /Jags here...the 3rd World undeniably had/has a problem with the proliferation of AIDS..but the surface should be scratched to see a little further. Many of these countries have a highly lucrative trade in 'sex tourism' where invariably holidaymakers of Western origin seek out sexual liaisons with poor people, who due to their economic circumstances will take more risks than people that work in the sex industry over here...light the blue touch paper and stand well back..the outcome is obvious...if there are any statistics that exist confirming the AIDS infection rate of 3rd world immigrants coming into the UK, I would like to see them and compare to Western tourists and workers abroad bringing it back into their indigenous cultures.
I found Judy's comments upsetting because they have the tendency to stereotype (negatively) a whole community of people and makes an already hard life, even harder for them. If there really is an issue of HIV positive immigrants coming over here and infecting, then we have a decision to make about blanket testing everyone that comes to live here..and most of all exercise caution over everyone we choose to have unprotected sex with...nuff said.
Quote by Kinky Lizard

I WANT HER!
I WANT HER!
I wonder if she'd come and live with me in my camper van????? I'll NEVER stop loving her! love you Abi
                                               K       I      N      K      Y                  L      I      Z      A      R      D
                 

...blimey, you look like her famous ex!! lol lol lol
Quote by Kinky Lizard

Gawd! I fancy her! The vid of her and the black woman is f**king amazing!
Cock-a-doodle-do!!
The bit where she is sat on her face having her arse licked..........Mmmmmmmm!!! biggrin
                                               K       I      N      K      Y                  L      I      Z      A      R      D
                                                

...e a s y Lizard...or you'll shed a skin!!! lol lol
..anyone else see the C4 documentary on Abi Titmus tonight?? I'd always thought she was fulfilling the 'attractive, girlfriend of someone famous' prophecy..but there's actually quite a bit about her. Sexy voice, self confessed swinger (she has the vid to prove it!), great personality..and she knows what to do with an anal thermometer..what else could a depraved boy ask for??! :shock:
lol lol lol
..was only thinking about this the other day. ICQ does still exist, although I guess for instant chat has been superseded by the big players and MSN Messenger particularly. Shame though, it really started the online chat revolution, but seems to be going the way that Betamax did on video!