Sean, we have both met and liked you. Do take care and we`ll look forward to your posts which were always thoughtful and meaningful anyway .
foxys x
Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
foxys
Over 90 days ago
Straight Male, 56
Bi-curious Female, 56
0 miles · West Midlands
Forum
Sexpert
I can see and undoubtedly many others can see where Love Commando is coming from on this. As a regular, what he did was inconsistent though. We are all aware that if your face fits you could post a description of sounds from last nights Vindaloo and still attract the adoring crowd.*
* please dont even think about it :scared:
Edited : Just read LC`s post...well acknowledged LC
* please dont even think about it :scared:
Edited : Just read LC`s post...well acknowledged LC
Sexpert
I don`t have a problem with grammatical errors as there isn`t a grammar checker around ...is there? (I bet there`s a grammatical error in here somewhere! One thing that always makes me laugh is when somebody pedantically points out a grammatical error only to find, normally too late that their post contained a spelling or grammatical error)
The content and spirit of a post is SURELY the most important thing BUT some of the examples given in this thread are surely an indication of the spirit intended and the attention they deserve?
Textspeak I fear is the way things are going. There are many words today which are relative newcomers existing under the name of convenience (all apostrophied words such as isn`t, can`t...also telly, car,moby, brekkie(sp?), brb,fwiw,rtfpmsl , nite) Granted many of these examples would not be used in a formal letter or email. Or would they? In a few years time maybe?
Personally I think it`s a dumbing down of a colourful, cosmopolitan language. However I reluctantly agree that it makes far more practical sense to spell a word phonetically. Also the inclusion of "hiphop" speak such as "DA"
Are these not valid additions to an ever changing language though? 
Who are we to argue?
The content and spirit of a post is SURELY the most important thing BUT some of the examples given in this thread are surely an indication of the spirit intended and the attention they deserve?
Textspeak I fear is the way things are going. There are many words today which are relative newcomers existing under the name of convenience (all apostrophied words such as isn`t, can`t...also telly, car,moby, brekkie(sp?), brb,fwiw,rtfpmsl , nite) Granted many of these examples would not be used in a formal letter or email. Or would they? In a few years time maybe?
Personally I think it`s a dumbing down of a colourful, cosmopolitan language. However I reluctantly agree that it makes far more practical sense to spell a word phonetically. Also the inclusion of "hiphop" speak such as "DA"
Are these not valid additions to an ever changing language though? Who are we to argue? 
Sexpert
Quote by xxdevil69
Our downside was always babytsitters (or lack of)The other downside we've faced is when you get on too well with someone.. I know this wouldn't be a problem for most but for us it was like going to bed with best friends. We like to get on with people, but not too well on the social front. (I know, we're weirdos!!!)
Snap, we must be weird too!
Although we`ve never been through the jealousy thing we are aware that it can reside in most of us. For those in loving relationships this whole thing is tantamount to playing with fire and although I could never be jealous of someone bigger or better sexually, I certainly like to keep a spiritual distance from anyone we may be intimate with...yet at the same time requiring a little familiarity for it to be fun!!! Very , very difficult
Sexpert
We have nowt personal to add as we check, then check again , then AGAIN just to make sure we know WHERE its gong to, WHO its going to and that its is sent from the right "name" 
However, this thread would be incomplete without the following thread which Im sure was the one which hooked us both.....hope he doesnt mind us doing this as he is not as abundant nowadays
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/9257.html
Foxys x
However, this thread would be incomplete without the following thread which Im sure was the one which hooked us both.....hope he doesnt mind us doing this as he is not as abundant nowadays
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/9257.html
Foxys x
Sexpert
Its a struggle to find any logical at football matches is not ANYWHERE NEAR as rife as it was in the lates 60`s,70`s and early 80`s, though just lately there has been a rise in high profile incidents.....not helped by the behaviour of too many over paid morons on the screen.
The confusing aspect of the `Auld Firm` trouble is that we are now 15 or 20 years on from the Mo Johnston signing.
How can Scotland fans spend many, (usually miserable :cry: weeks following their country ALL over the world, welcomed with open arms by ALL, famed for their humour and good behaviour worldwide,THEN return home to resume sectarian hostilities at the `Auld Firm` , hostilities such as Union Jack waving and national anthem singing on the one hand and sinister over reference to Irish roots on the other?
Its not the politics that confuse me SO much, its the thinking behind the hostilities that I cant get to grips with. Or is it that Scotland fans agree to put their differences aside when it comes to national football? In which case that is one heck of a pedestal to place football on...or is it a case of incorrect prioritising? Or am I crediting the yobs Glasgowllama refered to at the start with way too much intelligence? Bear with me , Im not Scottish....just genuinely concerned.
The confusing aspect of the `Auld Firm` trouble is that we are now 15 or 20 years on from the Mo Johnston signing.
How can Scotland fans spend many, (usually miserable :cry: weeks following their country ALL over the world, welcomed with open arms by ALL, famed for their humour and good behaviour worldwide,THEN return home to resume sectarian hostilities at the `Auld Firm` , hostilities such as Union Jack waving and national anthem singing on the one hand and sinister over reference to Irish roots on the other?
Its not the politics that confuse me SO much, its the thinking behind the hostilities that I cant get to grips with. Or is it that Scotland fans agree to put their differences aside when it comes to national football? In which case that is one heck of a pedestal to place football on...or is it a case of incorrect prioritising? Or am I crediting the yobs Glasgowllama refered to at the start with way too much intelligence? Bear with me , Im not Scottish....just genuinely concerned.
Sexpert
Quote by zootle
I responded to the rude "no" I got, I just replied saying "No need to be rude".
=Another site out there supplies % stats based on how many emails a particular advertiser has responded to. Needless to say that we have no desire whatsoever of making any contact with those who fall well below the 100% mark.
This seems just plain wrong. If an advertiser is getting responses from people who clearly haven't read their ad, or who are just taking a chance, or who are being rude, or otherwise wasting an advertisers time, then the advertiser is well within their rights to not respond. But by doing so, under the system you mention above, their rating will not be 100%, purely due to their getting crap responses to their ad through no fault of their own.
Zootle, I was aware that there may *appear* to be a paradox within my statement . the site is a very tight, pay site with a verification system
Im sure that if you advertise within "couples4couples" you should only receive responses from couples (?) With each response there is an automated "no ta" button which also appears to alleviate Judys problem of revealing private email. weve not had 1 mail from chancers and weve also been spared precious moments writing to people who probably wont even acknowledge us. FWIW I would NOT like to see this site follow suit and if I am over refering to the other site I would be happy for this post to be edited
foxys xxx
Sexpert
We have commented on this subject many times.
We can only comment on the "couples looking for couples" aspect (this is purely a social decision rather than sexual )
Couples looking for couples do not generally get a mailbox full of 100s of replies. We get a handful each time we place an ad. We reply to ALL as we are so darn flattered that anyone would take an interest in us.....UNLESS the sender clearly has not read the advert requirements in which case we may or may not respond. I think those who advertise for single males should be able to reserve the right to simply delete an email which clearly ignores your ad requirements. HOWEVER if you have the time to advertise on here and read through the mailbox full you yourself encouraged then I think that responses which clearly pay attention to your ad deserve a reply...in the name of decency. Any unwanted follow up to that polite reply should of course then be ignored.
Another site out there supplies % stats based on how many emails a particular advertiser has responded to. Needless to say that we have no desire whatsoever of making any contact with those who fall well below the 100% mark.
We can only comment on the "couples looking for couples" aspect (this is purely a social decision rather than sexual )
Couples looking for couples do not generally get a mailbox full of 100s of replies. We get a handful each time we place an ad. We reply to ALL as we are so darn flattered that anyone would take an interest in us.....UNLESS the sender clearly has not read the advert requirements in which case we may or may not respond. I think those who advertise for single males should be able to reserve the right to simply delete an email which clearly ignores your ad requirements. HOWEVER if you have the time to advertise on here and read through the mailbox full you yourself encouraged then I think that responses which clearly pay attention to your ad deserve a reply...in the name of decency. Any unwanted follow up to that polite reply should of course then be ignored.
Another site out there supplies % stats based on how many emails a particular advertiser has responded to. Needless to say that we have no desire whatsoever of making any contact with those who fall well below the 100% mark.
Sexpert
I think this might be an hello thread which nearly got away????? If so hello. :welcome:
If not, apologies and.....hello.
From one of the few remaining , definitely sane people.
We dont believe all this clap trap about being sane if you think youre going mad. We think we would be mad to believe THAT.......how insane would that be from a sane mind???
x
If not, apologies and.....hello.
From one of the few remaining , definitely sane people.
We dont believe all this clap trap about being sane if you think youre going mad. We think we would be mad to believe THAT.......how insane would that be from a sane mind???
x
Sexpert
Quote by zootle
Oh dear...maybe I should join you!
Curse the fact that I live so far away from you!
Oh when will someone invent teleportation...
Zootle! Take this thread : http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewpost/231058.html#231058
then randomly rearrange all of the text.....I think you`ll probably find the answer is in there somewhere :wink:
Sexpert
Quote by frogster
Between 1400 and 1450, I think….. sounds bad, but it only works out to about 1 a week on average over my active lifetime….. and some days there were more than 1 (on one day there was 4 different girls….. that was Braintree in Essex of all places)…
Nearly all of these were one night stands, maybe 100 or so were regular when we passed that way again…. And 6 were what I term as “long termâ€. :shock:
Anyway there it is………… but hey I have changed a lot……..ops: :!:
What The ???? Just read this!! Blimey and christ on a bike!!!!! :shock: Still, the mathematics work out okay
Loosely associated with entertainment it seems plausible to me.
For the record........me 2...............she 1........... :oops:
2 thoughts : Wonder if its possible to be minused "-" (as a result of our appalling and frankly quite unacceptable record to date)
Did it ever get mind numbingly boring for Frogster?
Sexpert
Surely, surely ,surely the definition needs to be rewritten.
It appears from our experience that most people want to know whether there was a way to tell whether someone in the chatroom actually existed or not, as oppose to what were the chances of a meet ending in recreational sex with a given person/couple.
"Active on the swing scene", as many threads and hundred of posts have shown in the past ,is impossible to define.
All we would want to know was whether somebody was of their claimed status (eg:single male/fem/couple where BOTH are involved) then, as has aready been mentioned, discussions can carry things forward which is surely what the chatting is all about.
the + sign doesn`t discriminate. The newcomer without the + is in the same position they would be in anyway i.e unverified as genuine.
There are some who reside in the chatroom who are not looking but clearly enjoy the chats and banter.. Maybe a quick nickname change with, for example ,N/L at the end? (not looking)
To us "meets others on the scene for consensual , recreational sex " is a slight over vulgarisation of what we are really here for.
If there is to be a middle ground then it may simply be in the definition.
It appears from our experience that most people want to know whether there was a way to tell whether someone in the chatroom actually existed or not, as oppose to what were the chances of a meet ending in recreational sex with a given person/couple.
"Active on the swing scene", as many threads and hundred of posts have shown in the past ,is impossible to define.
All we would want to know was whether somebody was of their claimed status (eg:single male/fem/couple where BOTH are involved) then, as has aready been mentioned, discussions can carry things forward which is surely what the chatting is all about.
the + sign doesn`t discriminate. The newcomer without the + is in the same position they would be in anyway i.e unverified as genuine.
There are some who reside in the chatroom who are not looking but clearly enjoy the chats and banter.. Maybe a quick nickname change with, for example ,N/L at the end? (not looking)
To us "meets others on the scene for consensual , recreational sex " is a slight over vulgarisation of what we are really here for.
If there is to be a middle ground then it may simply be in the definition.
Sexpert
Please please do not get disillusioned by the amount of people who cant even be arsed to say "thanks but no thanks"
Firstly, the people you have responded to, who`s ad you have read, who you have sent your own personal photo to , who dont even bother to respond..THINK!!!!! is that really the sort of person/s you would want to be intimate with???????? NO is the answer !!!
Not having time is no excuse when youve had the time to compile AND frequently update an advert.
Secondly...many of the "couples" do not exist.
Please dont worry...chins up.......you deserve .......and will find..... better.
Firstly, the people you have responded to, who`s ad you have read, who you have sent your own personal photo to , who dont even bother to respond..THINK!!!!! is that really the sort of person/s you would want to be intimate with???????? NO is the answer !!!
Not having time is no excuse when youve had the time to compile AND frequently update an advert.
Secondly...many of the "couples" do not exist.
Please dont worry...chins up.......you deserve .......and will find..... better.
