Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
lyns
3 weeks ago
Bi-curious Female, 44
Bi-curious Male, 48
0 miles · Bristol

Forum

This is the very first song myself and mr lyns danced to many moons ago...
Id say the same as Sara and mrs Bone, I don`t orgasm when I gush. It took me a while to mentally let go and even now I can`t always do it.
Have a few glasses of vino so your totally relaxed good luck and have fun trying lol
Quote by well_busty_babe
you know i think some of the comments here have been quite insulting to parents who chose to or have to work whist still bringing up their children, because lets face it, even if child has to go to nursery or childminer in the day time, it is STILL the parent who brings up the child.
we both work, yes we could manage without one of use working, but it would be existing not living. our children do not go without love or attention ever.
going back to work is in no way the easy option, in fact it is a damn sight harder, i do EVERYTHING a saty at home mother does, AND i work a full time job as well, please explain to me how that is the easy option????!!
if i turned the tables away from the "SELFISH" parents who work to provide for their children,
would it be considered acceptable for me to rant about LAZY parents who choose to stay at home watching daytime tv and not paying their own way? would it be ok for me to say THEY are not giving their kids the best start because they are in debt and unable to provide anything material for their kids? its ok to point our "research" about how kids are better off with parenst who stay at home, well there is also research that states that kids are better of with parents as role models who work hard to support themselves and manage their money well. there is also research to point out that kids that live in hovels in awful rough areas and do not have a healthy balanced diet due to lack of money are worse off, something that many parents work to avoid!
no! it would NOT be ok for me to start a thread making statements like that, so please have the same respect for those that do work!

:thumbup: my thoughts to
Quote by jaymar
I agree that people who have passed their tests should be asked to retake tests periodically, maybe 5 year intervals?.. I've been driving 5 years now and I've already developed habits that wouldn't have got me through my test, ie., parking etc.
I agree too many people pass their tests and go wild.

:thumbup: same here I passed about 5 years agos and I have bad habbits. Being completly honest tho im not sure I would pass with out some refresher lessons confused
I find the comment "going back to work is the EASY option" total bullshit.
Its not easy leaving a 6 month old baby with strangers but what choice do most people have? I have two options work and pay towards the bills or live in poverty, I know which one is better for my children.
I get myself up and ready, feed and clothe two children get one to school and one to nursery/family all before I start work at 9:30. To do it all in reverse to get home as well as fitting in all the jobs that have to be done at home.
Im not even sure I would want to stay at home all day everyday, I feel like I want adult conversation and company. I also like having some financial independence.
but the way of life involving stealing/prostitution will be just as much of a part of their lives as the drugs so I don`t think leagalising it will make much difference to the majority of users!
I am tho talking of harder stuff than just recreational.
Quote by benrums0n
This is intended to inspire a contentious debate amongst consensual adults.
Should all things be legalised?
I think they should.
Because:
Things are freely available anyway
If freely available Things are illegal:
Criminals make huge profits taht could be going to the taxpayer.
Users get bad things that kill them.
Users steal to pay the inflated thing prices.
What do u lot of free thinking folk think?

I suspect users will still steal to fund their habit and I very much doubt that it will become cheaper as the govt will tax it to the hilt anyway.
Sending our 4 year old upstairs or out to sit on the stairs works well for us, but im not sure it will work so well the older she gets.
I don`t think it is mentally cruel, but I guess it would depend on what the child was being put there for, if it was for say wetting the bed then yes I would think it was mentally cruel but if it was for drawing on the walls then definantly not. Having a prob getting thoughts from brain to fingers tonight so hope this make sense lol
I fully believe in a womans right to choose.
I do however think the gestational age that you can abort an unborn baby should be lower. A baby born prematurley at say 22/23 weeks can survive with medical intervention yet you can still abort a baby upto 24 weeks which doesn`t make sense to me.
I also think that it should be easier to access early abortions at say 8 weeks. I have know people who have made the decision to have a termination only to have to wait upto two weeks to get an appointment at the clinicto have a consultation to then have to wait upto another two weeks to have the procedure done.
I believe (and please correct me if I am wrong) that there are less complications when you have an earlier abortion.
Quote by JTS
Injustice casts a
lifelong shadow
By Carol Midgely
Mahmood Mattan was cleared of murder 46 years after he was hanged. His family explains why compensation will never be enough
This week a headstone was placed on the grave of Mahmood Mattan in a corner of Western Cemetery, Cardiff; the epitaph reads simply "Killed by injustice". Mattan's widow and his son Omar watched the proceedings quietly and then walked away to try to move on with their lives. But they cannot forget - and say they will never forgive.
On the morning of September 3, 1952, Mattan, a young Somali sailor, was taken from his cell at Cardiff prison, marched to the gallows and hanged for a murder he didn't commit. Seven weeks earlier, in a parody of a trial, he had been found guilty of slitting the throat of Lily Volpert, a Cardiff shopkeeper. The hearing at Glamorganshire Summer Assize in Swansea was so steeped in racial bigotry that even Mattan's defence solicitor described him as a "half-child of nature; a semi-civilised savage".
Despite his limited grasp of English, he did not have an interpreter and the jury did not know that the prosecution witness on whom the case hinged had altered his statement and been rewarded for giving evidence. It took 46 years and a dogged family campaign before the Appeal Court overturned Mattan's conviction and allowed his Welsh widow, Laura, to exhume his quicklimed body from its felon's grave at Cardiff jail and rebury it in consecrated ground.
Recently it emerged that the Home Office had paid compensation of about £700,000 (not £1.4 million as was widely reported, say the family), which is being shared four ways between Laura and the couple's three sons, David, 53, Omar, 51, and Mervyn, 50.
It might be expected that this, together with the erection of the headstone inscribed in both Arabic and English, a final act of dignity for Mattan, might enable the family to close the book on the miscarriage of justice that has blighted their lives. But the family say they feel that the money is tainted by their father's blood and that nothing will repair the damage caused by the decades of prejudice they suffered as "the children of the hanged man". They are seeking further compensation from South Wales Police for the arrest and unlawful execution of Mattan because it is the one card which they can play against the authorities: he cannot be brought back to life so they must try to shame those who helped to bring about his death.
"Part of me feels like taking the money, putting it in a pile and burning it outside the prison where they hanged my father, to show how little it means to us and how it can never pay for what they did," says Omar, a quietly spoken man. Both he and his brother Mervyn have given most of their share away to their own children and relatives. "Our father believed absolutely in British justice. Right until the last minute he didn't think he would be hanged because he thought the police would get the right man. And look what they did to him."
Nor does Laura, now 72, derive any comfort from the compensation. She still lives on the same Cardiff council estate and her face is drained of life - a legacy of 50 years of hardship and the loss of the man she calls her great love. "What does money matter really compared with the fact that he will never be able to sit down or go walking with his sons? It's nothing," she says. "I'm still devastated and I'll be angry until the day I die. This was a kind, gentle, loving father who respected me and loved this country and had so many plans for his family. He was an ordinary man but he was the best thing that had ever happened to me."
Mahmood Mattan met Laura Williams, a 17-year-old girl from the Rhondda Valley, while he was a foundry worker in Tiger Bay and she worked in a paper factory. Born in British Somaliland, he had gone to sea and settled in Wales. Tiger Bay and its bustling docks, where Indians, Chinese, Africans, Jews and Arabs worked shoulder to shoulder, was regarded at the time as a model of racial harmony. But in reality races were expected to stick with their own, and when Laura and Mattan began courting there was outrage in the community. People threw buckets of water at Laura, calling her a "black man's whore".
When the couple married three months later, few of their neighbours would speak to them. For a year - one which Laura describes as the "happiest of her life" - the couple enjoyed some respite from the racist taunts when they moved to Hull with their first two sons after Mahmood found work there. They should have stayed.
On the evening of March 6, 1952, Lily Volpert, a 41-year-old unofficial money-lender, answered a knock on the door of her Cardiff shop. Soon afterwards she was found by a neighbour lying in a pool of blood, her throat cut from ear to ear. Nine days later Mattan was charged with the murder. Police raided the Mattans' flat and found a broken shaving razor but no bloodstained clothes or any sign of the stolen £100.
Despite having alibis backed by witnesses, Mattan was convicted on microscopic flecks of blood on his shoes and the word of Harold Cover, a Jamaican who testified that he saw Mattan coming out of Volpert's shop. But the shoes had been bought secondhand and Cover was a violent criminal who was later jailed for life for the attempted murder of his daughter. The defence was not told that four witnesses had failed to pick Mattan out at an identity parade. Indeed one, a 12-year-old girl who had seen a black man near the shop at the exact time of the murder, told police that it was definitely not Mattan. They ignored her evidence.
The weeks her husband spent on remand were traumatic for Laura, now a mother of three young boys. The family's house was so close to the looming prison that if she looked out of her window at an appointed time she could see her husband waving a handkerchief from the window.
On the morning of September 3, Laura, still only 21, turned up at the jail as usual. As she stood outside the gate in torrential rain an official came out and pinned a notice to the gate. It stated that the execution of Mahmood Hussein Mattan had taken place at 8am and had "gone without a hitch". Laura had not even known it was going to happen. It was their son David's fourth birthday. Laura collapsed and was taken home by her mother. She was inconsolable and would not answer her door for nearly three weeks. Official reports say Mattan was 28 when he died, but the family insists he was only 24, having added four years to his age in Somaliland to enable him to go to sea.
"All I remember about that time is my grandmother looking after us and being told that mother wasn't well," says Omar, a painter and decorator. "Up until I was eight I was told that my father had died at sea, and I believed it. Then one day the Salvation Army band was playing near our house and I went out to sing with them. One of the leaders said: ‘We don't need the sons of hanged men.' Until I was about 12 that knowledge felt like a cancerous growth in my head. I can still remember my Dad carrying me on his shoulders, and when he bought me a huge teddy bear."
Omar spoke to the Imam who spent the final hours with Mattan in his cell before the execution. "He told me that he'd said to my father: ‘Now is the time to make your peace with God.' My father replied: ‘I have no peace to make. My conscience is clear.' "
The boys had problems enough growing up as half-caste children in a racially intolerant era, but having a hanged man as a father increased the stigma. They lived in abject poverty. "We were incredibly poor. We had to rely on charity for our clothes and food and roll up pieces of cardboard for the fire because there was no coal," says Omar. But Laura always told her boys that their father was innocent and they fought a long campaign to clear his name. Their first attempt to have the conviction overturned was refused in 1968 by the then Home Secretary, James Callaghan. But in 1996 they achieved their first breakthrough when permission was granted to have the body exhumed and reburied.
Even then, however, there was little dignity for the Mattans. "They wouldn't let us have a hearse," says Mervyn bitterly. "My father's body was carried in a dirty blue Transit van for the journey to the cemetery and his coffin was made of cheap plywood. The Home Office wanted it to be as low-key as possible. When they brought out the bodybag I touched it because I just wanted to feel close to him for a moment." In a further slight, the family, not the Home Office, had to meet the £1,400 cost of the exhumation.
As the campaign gathered strength, witnesses started to emerge. The 12-year-old girl, now an adult, came forward a second time to tell the family's solicitor about the identity parade where she ruled Mattan out. Then in 1997 came the biggest victory. The Criminal Cases Review Commission was set up to investigate alleged miscarriages of justice. Mattan's case was the first to be referred to the Court of Appeal where, in 1998, three appeal judges overturned the conviction.
What has upset the family most recently are reports that they are somehow living the high life on their compensation payments. They say that reports of them investing their money in property deals are rubbish. "I have given most of mine away," says Mervyn. "It wouldn't matter to me whether it was £50,000 or £2 million. It doesn't interest me. Money cannot buy back my father's soul and give us back the happy life he could have had with us."
To this day Laura still talks to her husband. Omar says: "She still sits in the armchair speaking to him. Quite often she tells him: ‘See? You should have listened to me. If we'd stayed in Hull like I wanted, then none of this would have happened and you'd still be here.' " Shamefully for British justice, she is right.

For the above reasons I hope the death penalty never comes back into the british legal system.
The age of consent is never going ot stop kids from doing things. When I was a teenager the age of consent was just another rule to be broken...
Education is the key.
Quote by X_fanny_x
just for the record .... i have asthma which is not very well controlled at times, thru no fault of mine .... smoke often makes it far worse .... therefore at times i am fearful of suddenly struggling to breathe due to other people smoking

So as long as you go no where near smokers you are happy??
I appeciate the asthma my brother has it quite bad - all of his family smoke if it bothers him he simply leaves the area where they are - no problem and he doesnt make it anyone elses problem either. He got to the point of realising it wasnt anyones fault that he had the illness
IMO you are implying that smokers are to blame for your asthma
My mums asthma is caused as a direct result of her smoking as was my nanas.
Have recently taken my little one to the docs quiering wether or not she has asthma and the doc told me that in children it isn`t always caused by smoking/passive smoking but in if you get it later on in like then it nearly always is.
Quote by well_busty_babe
adults do wrong, they commit unspeakable crimes, and yet we do not physically hurt them ( and rightly so in my opinion). why do we think it is acceptable to physically hurt children for doing wrong then?
if my daughter is cheeky to me i can hit her, but if my husband is cheeky to me and i hit him, it would be classed as domestic abuse. why does my husband have more right to protection from violence than my daughter has?

I have never really thought about it from this point of view. When you look at it like this it doesn`t make sense that we can leagally hit a child.
Dont be to hard on yourself, they are supposed to be the lighter way to enjoy chocolate..... :giggle:
Well done for loosing 8lbs :thumbup:
I think this is so sad. I can`t imagine what the families are going through right now. Parents who have not lost a child must be terrified thinking what if my child is next.
The sadest thing is that these young people felt that there was no other way to turn.
I understand that the police are not linking the deaths but it does seem to be strange that there have been so many so close together.
My heart goes out to all that are sadly involved in this tradegy.
I have voted stand up against the bullies. I can only imagine how scary it must be for her and her family but standing up for yourself is the only way forward.
Quote by helnheaven
Whats the point in fibbing? If there is a problem within a relationship surely lying and saying everything is ok is just heading for bigger problems.
Personally, Id rather say what the problem is and get it sorted instead of 'pussyfooting' around the subject.
You sometimes have to be cruel to be kind

:thumbup: :thumbup:
Quote by tyracer
People who make comments about someone in the workplace are nothing but bullies.
.

It only becomes bullying if it is done with mallice and intentionally said to hurt the person who you are making the comment to.
Commenting on someone elses work does not make me a bully, I think we all need some constructive critism sometimes.
Guilty as charged.... lol
I just can`t help myself, im an instore makeup artist and im constantly looking at other peoples makeup and thing wtf... :scared: .
Can I get a coffee and a bacon sarnie before I go to work please?
hearing does it for me every time closly followed by touch!.
Quote by Bonedigger
not directed in anyway at you Lyns, you know I loves ya....PS hows that cake coming along??

Its not.... decided im no good at baking cakes rotflmao
Sorry only just had time to come back to this.
I don`t know how to multi quote so i will just try to remember what has been contributed...
Had he had not been so rude and threatening I would have probably moved, I never park over someones drive on the school run and and I do park away from the school and walk the rest of they way.
If he had said I need/want to get my car out of my garden in a polite manner I would have moved but to be so rude to me when it wasn`t really necessary just pissed me off so I will be honest and just thought fuck you
pete_sw I do walk to school on non work days but on work days I just do not have enough time to get everyone to where they need to be before getting to work.
I never intentionally meant to block him in or inconvience him I never really thought about it I didn`t park there because I just felt I had a right to, I would never want to inconvience someone who had effectivly broken the law to park their car in their garden...
Sorry if this souds all over the place I was typing as I thought it lol
Quote by Bonedigger
and I vote for me, cos in my head im gorgeous :inlove:

Mrs B you are gorgeous passionkiss
I have searched the net for an answer but haven`t really found anything of any use.
Where my daughter goes to school parking is a problem as im sure it is in and around most schools at dropping off and picking up times.
Today I parked outside someones house who has paved over their front garden and parked on it. They do not have a dropped kerb. Whilst getting the baby out of the car I was approached by a member of the household asking if I had considered the fact that they might want to remove their car from their garden. I replied saying that the do not have a dropped kerb so do not really have any legal rights in asking me to move. He said I was causing an obstruction and that he could use force to remove my car... :shock: .
I believe that he caused an offence by driving his car over the pavement and that I was leagally allowed to park there.
Can anyone help? Whos right??
I feel crap, my throat is killing me and my head is pounding. Can I get some sympathy in here please cos I ain`t getting none at home... :cry: