Yes, yes, yes please Dawnie. :mrgreen:
Dress to impress eh, smart suits? Yes, I think I could give one of them a spin. Hmmmmm, traditional dinner suit and dicky-bow or smart cas relaxed and a loose, unbuttoned sexy shirt? Option two I think.
*polishes shoes*
Un bon viveur. Un vrai européen. In short, a bit Franglais.
24 posts already
Shockingly blatant post-whore
Settling in nicely
Entertaining so far
Good little newbie
Take your pick Medman, five ( yes, count 'em, five! ) choices for your three words for you. No, no need to thank me, you knock yaself out fella. ;)
Agreed Ben. It's a more genteel version of the BNP for some possessing a similar kind of naturally right wing Little Englander mentality but who find Griffin and his ilk a little brutish for polite company, they like the veneer of respectability UKIP affords for their thinly-disguised xenophobia, though even with UKIP the veneer is wafer thin. Don't believe withdrawal from Europe is anywhere near as advantantageous as UKIP would claim, or as straightforward with real downsides to it. Think the whole question more or less moot anyways, only the Tory right hankering for an England that never really existed for most of us making out it's the burning issue of our time anyways, UKIP is a useful foil for them. Would life in this country suddenly be hugely different for your average Joe if UKIP implemented their entire manifesto overnight? Would it fuck. Kick all the recent European immigrants out today and you might even find things are actually worse for it with the loss of their contribution to the net economy.
Very disingenuous that article Blue I think, the argument is not a valid one. The deer are presumably eaten as food once shot, the shooting is simply the slaughtering process used in this method of farming deer. May be a fun day out for the hunter in a way that is profitable for the farmer but that's an incidental bonus to the primary aim of food production, culling deer populations being necessary to maintain a healthy, sustainable herd while simultaneously putting food on the table. It's not the same. The badger cull is only indirectly linked with food production, and its value in protecting food production whether milk or beef is highly questionable. Would need to be much more certain of a positive effect before any cull could be justified, assuming there were no other measures available, which is also highly questionable. Anyways, the article is a transparent ad hominem attempting to smear Brian May personally, presumable because the CA's argument is so weak they have to resort to playground tactics and does not have popular support.
And what you say here has a permanence to it that someone can still come across long after the thread has sunk into the archives so your real personality becomes more apparent as it's revealed more over time as you accumulate posts. Harder to fake it here for long for sure, the mask always slips at some point for those that try it. And the regs are very regular, will come across a core of regular posters day in, day out and though that core changes over time it's not as changeable or as large as the list of regular people in a particular chatroom so you get to know them and they get to know you fast.
Wouldn't say you notice that you've been ignorant of people in the chatroom all of a sudden if I got that right. Not always possible to respond to everyone aims a comment at you, miss a lot and have to be selective in the conversations you join in with depending how many you can juggle all at once but same applies here. You don't respond to every post and every poster but perhaps more obvious who you're choosing to respond to and who you're not if anyone's ever inclined to read anything into that at all? Just as selective with the threads you join in with.