Don't worry I'll send you one Kent. Bi guy here, should be in keeping with the previous unwanted lot. Just ignore it! ;)

I feel the same about Gay Pride, why are you proud to be gay ? I am not proud to be hetrosexual
Quote by Dawnie
Neil I am genuinely impressed you have managed three months
Quote by noladreamsGo you!
Quote by Steve
3 months.....Well done fella
Quote by Steve
Next available appointment.......Thursday November 8th
If drugs were readily available to ALL addicts and drug users your telling me that the structure to treat all those extra people with Social workers and other professionals is already in place? Really?
Nobody can possibly say how many extra drug users would use the free drug centers,but if druge were freely available they would be swamped, and the system struggles to cope now as there are cutbacks on every level, so if it was to only increase by say 20% from current levels and the money is not there now, how do we go about treating all these extra people Neil?
Quote by Lizaleanrob
is the decline created by the decriminalization or way addicts are now treated
IE each case treated as an individual with proper help from the likes of social workers and psychologist
Quote by Meeko
Well done too Neil, I cut my drink down a few years ago but don't think it is something I would like to stop completely, I do enjoy the odd drink or 2 now and again.
Quote by Lizaleanrob
where did Neils post go
In fact so much less of a problem that I struggle to find any figures about this country at all.
Quote by starlightcouple
Then when Cameron was leader of the opposition remember this nonsense?
How Cameron wishes he never said that now.
Other measures are likely to include fines for prison bosses who fail to stop criminals re-offending after release, in a new "payment by results" system and an "element of punishment" in community sentences, which have been dismissed as a soft option.
the custom of giving £46 cash to all inmates when they are freed from jail may go.
"Cushy" regimes for prisoners will also come under attack
Sorry Too hot but because it works in a country very different to ours, that does not mean it would work here. Are there any figures on crime that we can compare with the two countries so as to judge how big a problem Portugal have, when compared with the UK?
Quote by Dawnie
How is everyone getting on
Quote by Too Hot
The war on drugs is a complete failure and a total waste of money. I am early 50's now and the war that was going on when I was a teenager is still going on - possibly worse now. Unfortunately - people take drugs - always have and always will. So if the same drugs strategy has been in place for 40 years and is not working - does it not make sense to try something else? Let's be real about this and just accept that a huge % of people have taken drugs at some stage in their life be it hash, acid, ecstacy, coke or something stronger. Many found it pleasurable, non addictive and a better social experience than alcohol and so continued it. Meanwhile we all get treated like children and told the same stories that we were told 40 years ago. Something has to change.
Quote by Cubes
I hold the view that our bobbies have access to firearms as/when they need them, and I'm actually quite proud to confirm to my American friends that our laws can mostly be upheld without their use. :thumbup:
Quote by starlightcouple
I am not a great believer in that if addicts could get their next fix from a medical centre that all would become well overnight. I think their drug habit would get worse in the long run, as they will take the free drugs and continue to do the crime to gain extra fixes.
Any drugs they were to be given out, would be under very strict guidelines, and many addicts would need far more drugs than the centres would allow.
But... I thought I would point out at this stage that Human Rights law is English law. The whole point of the Human Rights Act 1998 (which is UK legislation) was to bring the human rights protocols contained in the European Convention on Human Rights under the jurisdiction of UK courts. This is why people are able to raise human rights issues within the UK legal system (rather than the having to go to the ECHR).
If you're interested in the wider picture... The UK has signed up to a number of international (UN) treaties on human rights, but none of these form part of domestic law (so you cannot bring a claim in the UK courts under any of those treaties). In addition, the UK has signed up to the European Convention (which is regional law, rather than international law). The Convention was implemented by the Council of Europe (which is not the same thing as the European Union) following WWII in order to safeguard and defend human rights, democracy and the rule of law. (And, in answer to your original question, flower - given the atrocities committed in WWII that form the backdrop to the Convention, I think it is most definitely a good thing). The UK was very instrumental in drafting the Convention, and (as I have already said), since 1998 we have had our own UK legislation to make human rights law a part of our domestic law. In fact, given that we have domestic law on human rights, the European Court will only hear a case once all domestic avenues have been exhausted.
I think I may have got him to accept that he was wrong on a couple of occasions
But he may have just been flirting with me, 'cos I'm a girl
Does this mean that human rights legislation can be a good thing and is something we should embrace ?