Veejay's Forum Posts | Swinging Heaven

Join the most popular community of UK swingers now

veejay

Over 90 days ago

Straight Male, 40

UK

Profile Follows

Meets Parties Stories

Forum

7 Mar 2005

Quote by kristof
and guess what, at 43 I hope to be returning to university myself. A medical condition has fucked me up and stops me doing my original trade, so now I am a lazysod who lives on the dole

Good for you. In my time at uni, I've seen men aged 50 go to study a 5 yr masters in pharmacy (in the same class as his teenage daughter). One of my good freinds is about 45 yrs, she has grown up children too! And in another case, theres an uncle/nephew pair in the same class too. So 43 isn't going to be that old, there are enough mature students wheer I am, they have their own society where you need to be above a certain age to join!

Quote by kristof
I know a lot of students, a friend of mine is just finishing her 2nd doctorate, she took a few years off from working just to do the 2nd doctorate, thats costing her over Â£150k a year after tax for every year she dont work. She decided at 39 that her doctorate in pharmacology (which she begun aged 19) wasnt what she really wanted after all, (she only spent half her life using that doctorate for the benefit of others so obviously she was a lazy sod as well), so instead she is studying to gain a doctorate in Languages which wont help many people at all, just the lazy sods that want to go to university to learn other languages

Â£150K a year?? Since she's doesn't want it anymore, can I have her old job then? biggrin

biggrin

.

7 Mar 2005

Quote by Dave__Notts
Veejay
I have not agreed with what Ant has said, so I have ignored him on this point only.
I agree with most of what you said about the tax and paying your way through higher tax, etc. But please keep personal insults out of this, and making reference to a recent mass murderer is bad taste, in my opinion, as there could be users of the site that had family as victims. To hope another person is dead, is a dreadful thing to say. Like I said, I did not like Ants post but I would never wish harm to him.
Veejay, this is not a personal attack......just my thoughts my friend
Dave_Notts

I take your point (not in a physical way though!) and genuinely hope nobody is offended.
What got me angry was how he continued to carry on defending his original statement, even though many people had tried to tell him otherwise. He just sounds like the very people this thread was started for- a tw4t. Probably not genuine either.
I personally don't mind paying high taxes (which we do in this country). If only the govt got its act together and stopped the wastage. When road tax is paid, you'd expect to be able to drive on decent roads. And Nat Ins is meant to help for the NHS, I say no more........
Rather than bunching all students together, why doesn't anty realise that blair is to be held responsible. There is much more wasted in other sectors than gets "wasted" on education.
I agree that we have too many silly courses like "beer drinking" etc so that blair can say the youth unemployment has decreased. ( I know that young students drink alot of beer, but is there a need to teach them how to?), but I don't see how someone can group everyone together.
And I wouldn't want somebody, even like ant to meet an premature end (one of my mates was a patient of shipman's thankfully he was fairly poor and young). Though I'd like to give ant some laxatives, if the cr4p came out of his ass, then maybe there'd be none to come out of his gob?.

7 Mar 2005

Quote by ant140
I will....students are nothing but a bunch of tax dodging spongers in my eyes...they should get of their lazy arses and find themselves a job that benefits the community...the lazy sods!!! :evil: :evil:

How do people learn the things necessary to become the people who benefit society?

Quote by ant140
I obviously hit a raw nerve with alot of you...but that is my opinion of students..
if alot more concentrated on their "studies" rather than spend their well earnt time surfing the net at the college or universitys exspense then people like me wouldnt get upset..
as for all the abuse been hurled at me...I wouldnt expect anything less from people who do just sit on their backsides and go from course to course and dodge work!!!! :x :x
in my eyes all students are twats
:roll:

Your the twat here. Its not the govt. who pays towards my education, its people who earn more and pay more tax. That money doesn't belong to or either. The people who pay more tax now were probably students themselves once upon a time too. As a professional man, I too will be paying a higher rate of tax than some scrubber like yourself. I'll probably pay much more back to the treasury than was ever spent on me. So I resent being called a scrounger or lazy.
I just hope you need a doctor oneday, and end up meeting the next :x

3 Mar 2005

Quote by Wilki
Being serious, for a moment, a woman died from V fisting a few miles from me, a couple of years ago, the guy nearly went to prison for it.

Died from fisting? Did he use both hands or something? Strange, a womans vagina can pass a babies head through it, but not a fist. He must have been too vigorous then?

28 Feb 2005

Quote by doctorg
not sure if this is the place, but I'm using firefox and the chatroom loads but I get no registration free entry and when i put in a name to register it just says it's not. Apologies for being dim probably

I use Firefox. Works O.K. Have you installed the Java plugin?

28 Feb 2005

This is Swinging Heaven, not legal Heaven biggrin

biggrin

I thought you'd be thinking of another kind of group action :eek:

24 Feb 2005

Quote by astylover
Hi im a newby, the male half of a couple, and thought I should do a little research into what constitutes safe sex. Looking at the adverts section I was worried regarding the number of females saying they only have penetrative sex with a condom yet are willing to give blow jobs and drink cum.
I'm fully sure regarding penetrative sex but unsure regarding oral sex so, I thought if I'm unsure others must be too?
I found this extract on a South African Health web site which is quite illuminating.
At one stage it was advertised on our local (South African) television that oral sex can be used to replace penetrative sex (sexual intercourse) because it safer in terms of becoming infected with HIV. In a way this may be true because the infection rate is indeed much lower. However, this degree of 'safety' should be considered with caution as it is NOT 100% safe at all. If you have any sore, cut etc. in your mouth and your sex partner is HIV-positive you will indeed become infected. The virus can enter such an injury with great ease. The problem is that one often has such injuries in your mouth without even knowing it. For example after having eaten hard sweets, biscuits etc. there will be many such small cuts on the inside of your cheek. They may not be painful and you may not even be aware of them. Something else worth mentioning is that during oral sex, if the male is doing it to the female, he stands a greater risk of becoming infected that when the female does it to the male. The reason for this is because the virus is present in the vaginal fluids whereas in the case of the male it present only in the ejaculation fluid ('cum') of the male. It is not present in the lubrication fluid ('pre-cum') secreted by the male when he is sexually aroused. The danger, however, with a female doing it to a male is that the latter does not always warn the female in time that he is about to reach a climax and ejaculate, sometimes by accident but sometimes deliberately. If you are a female, let the male wear a condom. And do not let him talk you into believing that a condom reduces sensitivity. That is absolute nonsense! Your life is at stake. Anyway, nowadays - if you can afford them - you get flavoured condoms to make the task more enjoyable.
Hope this helps others to make up their mind, it has me
astylover xx

Spot on advice there.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by Scandal
Though I choose to eat poultry only as its healthier than red meat.

You are seriously kidding?

rotflmao

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
No I'm being serious, though things have changed now. But if chickens were raised the old-fashioned way and processed correctly, they would contain less fat than red meat.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
I don't want to be a pedant Veejay but cannibalism is eating other people, not yourself.
Personally I would rather eat a placenta that I had produced (unlikely I know ! ) than the mass produced foodstuffs like American beef packed with hormones and steroids or genetically modified giant king prawns grown in artificial environments, bleached white and sprayed with pink paint !

I hear what your saying. I don't agree with loading cattle with steroids and hormones either. No wonder we're having the emergence of diseases. I wonder what the effect of the presence of steroids/hormones in beef is having on the health of the Americans. They're already an obese population as it is.
Look sat heir president and you will see the effects quiet clearly!!
Like him or not, bush is actually in quite good shape for his age. I heard his cardio-vascular system is similar to that of a much younger man. Though if your suggesting in terms of his intellectual capacity, you may have a point.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by chamoix
my geography teacher taught us that if we was in the desert and dying of thirst it would be better to drink each others urine because you would get less toxic waste that one has used before and different body system produce a better more benifital urine.

When your in the desert, your more at risk of death from dehydration, than renal failure if you don't drink pee. In that situation, you would have to drink your own pee if you want to survive. Renal problems would only develop if you were drinking large amounts of urine over a longer period of time.
But I don't think there is any logic in drinking eachothers urine. Best stick to your own.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
Try to think beyond your own society, some religions and societies would never think of eating anything that had lived. Personally i do nt view anything that has had a face as food, the idea disgusts me.
However the placenta has never lived independantly therefore i find the eating of it as exceptable and not at all canibal like. As scandal implies, at least we know where it has been .

But you could say the same about an unborn child. Untill birth, the baby hasn't lived independantly. It needs everything from the mother- oyxgen, nutrients and minerals etc. Pregnancy can be thought of as an invasion of women. Like a leech, the foetus takes everything without giving anything back.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a veggie and have no probs with eating I choose to eat poultry only as its healthier than red meat. But I can't think of any reason why its necessary to eat the placenta.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by Bloke2005
The placenta is classed as an organ in it's own right until the baby is born. It then dies pretty quickly (it actually starts to calcify in the late stages of an over 'term' pregnancy) so, technically it is 'born' of the egg rather than the embryo which is a product of the egg and the sperm... ain't there any medical doctors on here? I spent my entire summer 2004 working on a labour ward but not 100% on this one

I think the placenta comes from the embryo. After fertilisation, mitosis starts fairly rapidly. By the time it comes to implantation, you would need to have a fairly large clump of ceels from which the placenta forms. (remember the fertilised egg/sperm is still only a single cell).

24 Feb 2005

Quote by Scandal
I don't want to be a pedant Veejay but cannibalism is eating other people, not yourself.
Personally I would rather eat a placenta that I had produced (unlikely I know ! ) than the mass produced foodstuffs like American beef packed with hormones and steroids or genetically modified giant king prawns grown in artificial environments, bleached white and sprayed with pink paint !

I hear what your saying. I don't agree with loading cattle with steroids and hormones either. No wonder we're having the emergence of diseases. I wonder what the effect of the presence of steroids/hormones in beef is having on the health of the Americans. They're already an obese population as it is.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
Dosnt beef grow on cows?, dont shellfish grow in polluted water? dont vegetable grow in soil and shit?(personally id never eat eithr of the first two)
The point is that at least placenta is your own and you know where its been

Beef and shellfish etc is considered foodstuff and you need to eat to survive. I know that due to hunger people will eat each other, but I don't think women/men who eat placenta are normally starving. Just very odd that they'd go to the trouble of cannibalising.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123

Thats just disgusting. Wouldn't that be a form of cannibalism?
If they were really after Iron, then couldn't they just take some supplement tabs?

I think you have missed the point. The placenta is a natural supplement
Some one correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the placenta grow from the embryo? How can you eat that?

24 Feb 2005

Quote by HungryP
Well - my gran always said that drinking the first pee of the day was very good for your skin . And no - I haven't felt the need to test her theory out!!!

Mahatma Gandhi used to drink his own urine every day & did it for many years. Urine doesn't carry any disease & is quite healthy.
Pah, don't make me laugh. Of course urine contains bacteria. You have bacteria being washed out from all along the urethra. Its how you can sometimes test people for signs of UTI's too.
Ammonia is a product of protein metabolism. Urea is derived from ammonia which is very toxic. Urine primarily contains urea, you also get some salts (and in diabetics glucose) dissolved in water. There is nothing much useful or magical about drinking piss. Your body only gets rid of it because it is waste product. All you do by drinking it is place extra burden on your kidneys which have to excrete it again.
Try drinking all your own urine constantly, how long do you think you will last before getting renal failure?

24 Feb 2005

Quote by Rainbows
Well - my gran always said that drinking the first pee of the day was very good for your skin . And no - I haven't felt the need to test her theory out!!!

I think your gran may have been very confused.

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123

Yep....... and did you no that some tribs eat there own after birth as it contain nutrents

What do you mean, "some tribes"? its still done here, i know people who have asked the midwife to preserve the afterbirth so that they could take it home and eat it. I think its rich in iron which is what meany women need after giving birth If i remeber correctly you boil it!
Thats just disgusting. Wouldn't that be a form of cannibalism?
If they were really after Iron, then couldn't they just take some supplement tabs?

24 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
Please tell him. the delay may not have been his fault, could have been the post office or he may have been ill or anything.
With clothing lines in particular, ebay traders dontmake that much profit hence the costs are so low.

I can understand what you are saying and do feel this is the right thing to do - although it doesn't excuse his lack of communication and general lack of manners or the excuses he kept giving me
No it dosnt excuse his behaioour but niiether is it an excuse for you to keep them. Just email him tell him whats happened and point out how dis satisfied you were with his service. Obviously if he wants the surplus goods posting back he has to arrange a postage payment to you first before you send them, There is a chance he may not want to bother and tell you to keep the goods in which case you have a clear conscience
The best thing in my opinion too.

23 Feb 2005

Quote by Silk and Big G
So to sum up . It isnt parents responsibility to control their kids , unless it involves physical abuse .

Not at all. First of all, its every parents duty to protect their kids from harm And if you read what I have written above, you'll see that I say that parents need to teach their kids right from wrong, and not encourage them in the wrong direction

Quote by Silk and Big G
We shouldnt punish children in school for fear of causing them resentment but the "system" should be harsher in the way they punish them ,

We should punish kids- but there are ways of punishing people without humiliating them in front of others. How about detention? And visits to parenst of disuptive kids? If that doesnt work why don't they expel them, rather than pu55y foot about?
What we get now is a visit to a shrink who comes up with some excuse for them to get away with poor behaviour. Worst is when such kids get sent on special excursions and day trips. How does that solve anything?

Quote by Silk and Big G
oh and teachers are paedophiles.

I didn't say all of them are. It was just a side note I made. But I think everyone would agree that even today there will be paedos working as teachers. Remember the police guy who was working with the Soham families? wasn't he supposed to be one too?
So if you can get someone in such a position being a , then it isn't too outrageous to say that there will be afew teachers who are also that way.

23 Feb 2005

Quote by Silk and Big G
Cant decide wether thats agreement or disagreement . Maybe its me .

It's really a combination. In my opinion, you need to have both for a failed person- parents who can't give a .... and kids intent on wrecking themselves. There are kids I've seen born in bad circumstances who change things for themselves and those who have it all yet still manage to screw things up.
It was my way of saying that there are sometimes when parents do try, yet they fail because the little bugger is determined to make a mess of themself. And in those situations you can't blame the parents so much (thoough there are parents who don't try at all/encourage bad behaviour too mad

mad

).

23 Feb 2005

Quote by BigDanny12999
Recently my Uncle was working under a car, fixing the exhaust when the car suddenly started coming down on him. He slid out just in time to see a boy of no more than 9 who had been lowering the jack onto him. he chased after the kid, caught him and explained to him what would have happened if he had managed to lower the jack the whole way before telling him that he would talk to his parents about his bad behaviour.
That afternoon the kids Dad turns up at my Uncles house with an axe, ready to use it on my Uncle because he had berated his Son.
How do you legislate for parents like this? You can't.

What a toss3r. No prizes for guessing why that little sh1t is the way it is. Its at times like this I think a licence to have children may not be such a bad idea. Some scum just shouldn't be allowed to breed.

23 Feb 2005

Quote by VenusnMars
Have to say though, she never bad-mouthed her elders, she chose to play headgames with them instead, she constantly adopted strange behaviours in order to test her teachers.....they used to bloody fall for it too When I didn`t, they assumed I didn`t care about her worrisome mental state.
Bloody goths :lol2:
Venusxxx

She sounds like a clever girl. Do you think her being bullied may have been a problem? Kind of reminds me of someone. Wasn't a bad kid, just in a difficult situation which caused them to react badly.

23 Feb 2005

Quote by BradfordCpl
Bring back the cane. :smackbottom: :smackbottom: :smackbottom:

I agree that the cane should be brought back, but only for parents to use at home. I don't think we should give teachers the right to hit children. Especially in front of the class as it will a form of humiliation that will cause resentment.
And then there will always be the odd teacher who will enjoy the act of caning a kid in school uniform abit too much (if you guys see what I'm saying). :shock:

23 Feb 2005

Quote by Silk and Big G
Don't blame the mouthy little buggers. Blame the irresponsible parents who give up or cant face the fact that they need some kind of assistance in raising their children.
Silky xx

Sorry, I disagree here. I come from a family where my dad didn't really give a to55. He was never around when I was growing up. My mother was a very ill woman who needed looking after herself. I grew up in a very rough area where there was a very high crime rate etc. Most of my old friends from my teen years became teen fathers and have been inside too.
But I wouldn't say I've turned out too wrong. I do agree that parents need to take responsibility for their kids. But also kids need to take rersponsibility for themselves. If you went to places like Africa and , young children who are orphaned have to practically raise themselves. I think the system is too soft, disruptive kids need harsher punishment. They are like cancers- one in a crowd infects the whole bunch.

22 Feb 2005

Quote by kinkyluton
i bet they wont come back...and if they do......you know who to ring......

Who- the ghostbusters? biggrin

biggrin

The police are another bunch of useless scum. Ring them and you'd be lucky to get through to an answer machine. My friend got attacked in broad-daylight awhile ago. The police were rung and told that the culprits were still hanging around nearby. Did they rush to arrest them? NO. (what a suprise). They told him to jot down their car registration number and a description of what they looked like. Eventually the cops did turn up- the next day. Guess what? The car the lads were driving was nicked too so there was no way of tracing them.
Try talking any sense to the pigs and they threaten to nick YOU instead. Reason being you'd be a softer target than the real crooks. If they bothered tackling real crime instead of sitting in vans watching for motorists somethings may be different?
And don't get me started on judges. Those daft, pompous, idiots are another lot who are responsible. Its disgraceful that you need to refer to them as "your honour". What kind of honourable people allow criminals to be set free? Does anyone remember the case of the defendant got set free by the judge because he wrote some poetry?
Sickening isn't it?
Rant over... Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh.

22 Feb 2005

Quote by Tania
Oh the laxative chocs thread was about a person? I thought it was about a cat!!! LOL

I thought it was Eagerslut who ate the chocs.
Still if a cat ate them, if you wanted to keep them indoors you'd need to use the plug on them too (please, nobody tell the RSPCA) biggrin

biggrin

22 Feb 2005

Dunno. You'll have to ask the ladies. (or some gents)

22 Feb 2005

Quote by Tania
Who is ES? How many buttplugs should I order?

ES- EagerSlut. Didn't he eat those laxative chocolates last night? :shock:

22 Feb 2005

Quote by foxylady 123
My GP dosnt have a sense of humour!! You may be right about the oxygen levlesl, but i wasnt given these injections for my blood disorder, but for eyesight problems and by a specialist.

It doesn't acually matter, if you have a deficiency in intrinsic factor for B12 absorption, then it would need to be given in a non-oral way i.e via I.M (though you'd probably like abit of oral too biggrin

biggrin

).
But what you get in the I.M will contain the same active ingredient- B12. Chances are you did experience some benefit in terms of oxygen too.