Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
Mr_D_and_HotTart
Over 90 days ago
Bisexual Male, 56
Bisexual Female, 62
0 miles · Hereford and Worcester
Forum
Quote by PoloLady
But how do you expect the 'neanderthals' to know the difference between the times when you are happy for them to comment and the times when you are not - they are neanderthals after all!
Quite simple... use a room with "No Directing" in the title when you don't want to deal with a constant stream of demands. Of course you still need to explain what no directing means all the time, but at least you get to warn then kick (or get the room owner to warn then kick if it's not yours)
In the terms and conditions for this site is the following phrase:
This is currently being strictly applied in the chatroom. To avoid bans, I suggest chatroom users take great care not to let anyone else (site user or non site user) use their keyboard while they are logged in. If you wish to hand over to someone else, leave chat, log out and have them log in under their name and then rejoin chat, especially if you are a cam user who can be seen by chat ops.
(I've tried very hard to keep my personal opinions out of this post and keep this to facts that other users might find useful. I hope this post isn't interpreted as criticism of the rules, ops or site. This post is intended purely to draw people's attention to this rule and it's implications, so they can avoid breaking it.)
Your membership is for your sole use only, transferring or 'lending' of this account to any other person is prohibited.
This is currently being strictly applied in the chatroom. To avoid bans, I suggest chatroom users take great care not to let anyone else (site user or non site user) use their keyboard while they are logged in. If you wish to hand over to someone else, leave chat, log out and have them log in under their name and then rejoin chat, especially if you are a cam user who can be seen by chat ops.
(I've tried very hard to keep my personal opinions out of this post and keep this to facts that other users might find useful. I hope this post isn't interpreted as criticism of the rules, ops or site. This post is intended purely to draw people's attention to this rule and it's implications, so they can avoid breaking it.)
if you know their EXACT user name then you can get to their profile, which will have a link to their ads.
What you need to do is go to a profile from the chatroom (or use this link to mine http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/members/show-member.html?u=mister_discreet ) then change the last bit after the ?u= to the username of the profle you want.
Good luck!
What you need to do is go to a profile from the chatroom (or use this link to mine http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/members/show-member.html?u=mister_discreet ) then change the last bit after the ?u= to the username of the profle you want.
Good luck!
Firefox users with the adblock extension can turn off the flashing by adding the following to their adblock filters:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/images/new-menu.gif
If it helps Elliot, it's an animated gif located at the URL above, replacing it with something static woud stop everyone being annoyed by it.
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/images/new-menu.gif
If it helps Elliot, it's an animated gif located at the URL above, replacing it with something static woud stop everyone being annoyed by it.
Quote by devondouble
Hello,
I was just on the chatrooms and could not believe some of the names of the chat rooms that are allowed. I am by no means a prude, but surely naming a room that is linked to something that is illegal is not good for the reputation of this fine site.
Maybe i am being to sensitative.
regards
Dawn
I saw the room name that I think you are referring to, and went straight to the "home of the chatroom ops" room to see if there was anyone I could report it to.
There was a whole series of fake event rooms created this afternoon, starting with the believable "wife on cam in 10 minutes" and progressing to one that went well beyond just being a waste of time and into the realm of offensiveness.
Perhaps the name of every room's creator could be displayed somewhere to discourage the creation of fake rooms?
We are a long way off the longest... I think the word assosication or hangman threads got to about 130 pages before being deleted, which at 20 posts a page means about 2,600 posts.
I've seen a thread with over 110,000 posts on a MMPORG game site (the forum rules specified all posts must be in english, apart from that one thread which a large number of Dutch users treated as a chatroom for a few years).
I've seen a thread with over 110,000 posts on a MMPORG game site (the forum rules specified all posts must be in english, apart from that one thread which a large number of Dutch users treated as a chatroom for a few years).
Why not set up a passworded room, and only give out the password to couples?
If you open a second instance of chat, you can use a second room to give out the password by whisper.
This means you can be flexible about admission, and make your own mind up about all the exceptions to the rule, such as couples that have seperate his and hers sign-ons, cd/tvs who choose to describe themselves as single females, and those strange couples where the male partner is wanking on cam 24/7 and the female is never seen.
If you open a second instance of chat, you can use a second room to give out the password by whisper.
This means you can be flexible about admission, and make your own mind up about all the exceptions to the rule, such as couples that have seperate his and hers sign-ons, cd/tvs who choose to describe themselves as single females, and those strange couples where the male partner is wanking on cam 24/7 and the female is never seen.
At a guess they are screening out timewasters, and people who's pics date back to the years before their hair fell out and the beer belly obscured their feet. Any website has it's fair share of timewasters, wierdos*, chancers and people with body odour problems, none of which you can easily filter out without a meeting.
Oh, and if anybody finds a good place in north london for bi guys to meet couples, be sure to invite me
* like me
Oh, and if anybody finds a good place in north london for bi guys to meet couples, be sure to invite me
* like me
Perhaps one of the permanent rooms could be dedicated to chatting?
This wouldn't take much work, just renaming (for example) 'The Riverbank' to 'Chat only - No Cams'. I think this would please a lot of the old guard who enjoy a nice natter over a cup of tea, and wouldn't need much work to enforce, as the baying hoardes would be put iff by the title.
This wouldn't take much work, just renaming (for example) 'The Riverbank' to 'Chat only - No Cams'. I think this would please a lot of the old guard who enjoy a nice natter over a cup of tea, and wouldn't need much work to enforce, as the baying hoardes would be put iff by the title.
I've just filled out a (very) few of the items in my profile, but I'm somebody who would rather make my mind up about people by chatting to them, or at munches than by looking at a checklist. Horses for courses though, so I agree that if you expect to make contact with people via the chatroom or adverts then a reasonably complete profle is a necessity.
The law says 'no visibly aroused genitals to be shown on TV'. The most you'll see on Telewest is softcore porn. Don't be fooled by the movie titles, a lot of british porn is shot in two versions, softcore and hard. It strikes me as a ridiculous moral positon to hold when you can go buy the worst excesses of GGG's porn films in the high street on DVD but you can't see a hard-on on an encrypted pay channel TV, but no politician seems to have the guts to sort this mess out.
