Another vote against 'Winks' and 'stealth' cam viewing here.
Everybody hates cut-and-paste 1-line replies to ads, so the owners decide to add a feature that lets people send them out without even having to cut and paste! D'oh!
Please either remove this 'feature', or at the very least let users choose not to recieve winks.
1) Go to one first! You will need to know what to expect, especially about dress, numbers, behaviour, badges etc.
2) A right-sized private room at a sensible price
3) Proximity to at least one sensibly priced hotel
4) A findable location - the simpler the directions the better!
5) Adequate car parking
Reminds me of one of my favourite IRC quotes...
<FlipTopBox> wow... spam in my inbox: "See Girls with buckets of cum all over their faces!
<Slant> FlipTopBox: Dude. Give them some credit, it's hard to balance a bucket on your face.
Here's a foolproof betting system for you...
1) Put £1 on anything at odds of 2:1. If you win, quit, you are £1 up.
2) You are £1 down. Put on anything at odds 2:1. If you win, quit, you are £1 up.
3) You are down. Put on anything at odds 2:1. If you win, quit, you are £1 up.
4) You are down. Put on anything at odds 2:1. If you win, quit, you are up.
5) You are down. Put on anything at odds 2:1. If you win, quit, you are £1. up
6) You are down, Put on anything at odds 2:1. If you win, quit, you are £1 up
...and so on. Each time you bet enough to end up £1 in profit. Of course, you do need an infinite amount of money to sta5ke...
As I understand it, people were told "pay into this optional extra pension and then you can retire on half your final pay at 60", and that's why they signed up to it and made many years of payments... now the government is trying to wriggle out of it's obligations.
I have "Receive Swinging Heaven news letters etc?" set to no, but I'm still getting weekliy mailings :huh:
I agree, the ablity to turn this mail off would be greatly appreciated!
hmm, not too much of a top-heavy 4x4 then, it's got a fairly wannabe rally car look to it, which I don't object to anywhere near as much as the 'let's see how tall we can make it' brigade.
Kerb Weight. 1793 kg. Towing Limit. 1870 kg. Safety Rating 4 stars. Fuel consumption 39.8 mpg (see what I mean about govt figures not bearing much relation to the real world?)
I'm having a hard time finding a heavy enough luxury saloon to comapre it to, but as an example...
Mercedes Benz E-Class 220 CDI Classic
Kerb Weight. 1610 kg. Towing Limit. 1900 kg. Safety Rating 5 stars. Fuel consumption 42.8 mpg
(all figures from the same site)
If you've now found the partner your advert says you are looking for, you can contact admin to have your profile changed to a couple.
Are we back to the 1970s?
Do we really still have industries where taking a day off and leaving your customers in the lurch is considered a sensible way of resolving disputes with management?
Sorry, but I'm on the side of the children who are being deprived their education for a day, and the families who have suddently had to arrange to look after them at their expense.
If you have a beef with your employer, go to court, go to dispute resolution, or simply go work somewhere else, don't take it out on everyone else.
Owner's fuel consumption figures will vary wildly, depending on use, and are almost always better than the government standardaised tests. I've seen everything from under 30mpg to over 65 from my current car, which has an official figure in the high 50s.
Without knowing a make and model and looking at the official figures you can't make a reliable comparison.
I'm not going to spress Steve_mids for his specific make/model/engine size becasue that's prying, but it's a simple fact of physics that aerodynamic cars are more economical than tall boxy ones, and no amount of pride of ownership is going to alter that!
Can't find any CO2 data online, but the MPGs probably give a good indication...
Ford Scorpio 2.9 24v Ultima
Weight: 1781kg (owners manual says it's suitable for towing up to 2000kg)
Urban MPG: 19.5
MPG at steady 56mph: 34.4
Driver Saftey Rating: 4 stars
Pedestrian Safety rating: 3 stars
Vauxhall Frontera 2.2 DTL 16v
Weight: 1820kg
Urban MPG: 18
MPG at steady 56mph: 21
Driver Saftey Rating: 3 stars
Pedestrian Safety rating: 1 star
This topic is mixing up several different concepts, and I think it's in danger of becoming a slaging match rather than a discussion.
2 wheel drive vs 4x4: Lumping all 'chelsea tractors' together is missing the point, which is that almost nobody needs a 4x4 instead of a 2wd version of the same vehicle. In the late 80s, Audi won some rallys with the 4x4 Quattro, and from then on it's become something of a status symbol. 4 wheel drive is bolted onto lots of cars where it's totally inappropriate - Ford even made a 4x4 Granada!
The fact is that if you don't go seriously off road, then you are paying for and carrying around a lot of mechanicals that you really don't need, which soak up petrol and therefore pump out emissions unnesessarily.
The next topic is safety. I'm fed up with the chant of "I need a 4x4 to be safe" - I'm sorry, but the heavier your verhicle, the more likely you are to kill whoever you hit in an accident. The truth is that tall 4x4s are far more likely to roll over than normal cars, and 4x4 pick-up trucks (the worst of the breed) are counted as commerical vehicles and are exempt from lots of safety laws. Even if it was true that 4x4s are safer, we are in danger of starting an arms race, with everyone wanting to be bigger, taller and heavier than everyone else on the road - which is already happening in America.
As for towing a caravan... why isn't the government encouraging you to buy a second, more economical car to use when you are not towing? Tax discs actively discourage this. Where's the tax encouragement to build lighter caravans? The government is dressing up a cynical tax grab by pretending it's 'for the environment', which really annoys me.
I drive a car that uses less petrol than the ;holier than thou' Toyota Prius electric hybrid... but under the new rules the tax is up from £70 to £100... where's the sense in that?
High time that the tax disc was replaced with an 'I've actually got insurance' disc.
Oh no! Not the SH clock thread!
680... hmm, down a bit since last time - I'm slipping!
I think it's because all that S&M gear takes too long to do up and undo?
From "So Hard" by the Pet Shop Boys, a bouncy little number about a couple who have come to terms with the way they both shag around...
I double-cross you
And you
Get mysterious mail
I've tried hard not to shock you
It's hard not to
With the things I could say
You lock your letters
In a box
And you've hidden the key
I go one better
I'm indebted
To a contact magazine
I'm always hoping
You'll be faithful
But you're not, I suppose
We've both given up smoking
'Cause it's fatal
So whose matches are those?