Join the most popular community of UK swingers now
Login
gulsonroad30664
6 hours ago
Straight Male, 69
0 miles · Kenilworth
Forum
Quote by Max777
yes we are blue. last week the head of b.a. says security measures at airports are superflous, aids of obama said months ago that nothing short of a 9/11 terror attack could get the democrates and him re-elected, the london times reported in july that alawaki had dinner with the head of the u.s. army at the pentagon months after 9/11.
alawaki is now number 1 of and is in yemen (yemen controls the entrance to the gulf) and, the yemen government made a statement on friday that no u.p.s. aircraft has flown out of yemen in the last week and there are no direct flights out of yemen to the u.k. !
So Qatar Airlines are lying when they say that one of the devices flew on two of their passenger planes? The other device is thought to have come to the UK via Dubai and Cologne, not on a non existent direct flight from Yemen.
funny how this terror alert comes within days of the u.s. mid term elections where the incumbent democrates are expected to loose. just like the underpants bomber at christmas preceded the rolling out of high resolution, high x-ray radiating body scanners at major airports ? we are being fed crap terror to keep us in fear, take away our rights in the interests of freedom and being sold the lie that the policy of foriegn wars is for peace ?
Maybe, just maybe, the introduction of the scanners was as a result of the underpants bomber???????? Or is that too simple an explanation for the conspiracy theorists?
the war on terror is a war of terror for all the peoples of the world and pure goebles propaganda to subjugate us all. the wars and occupations of iraq, afghanistan, northern pakistan and likely yemen and iran are to control the oil, gas and minerals of that part of the world for anglo-american interests for profit and have nothing to do with the mythical creation of an evil international resourceful terrorist organisation led by an unaging suposedly ex c.i.a. asset holed up in a cave in afghanistan.
fortunately, even the x factor/football struck masses are beginning to wake up to the fact that they are being constantly spun a pack of lies.
Ifor one am happy that security measures together with intelligence information resulted in these devices being found. Maybe it will take another plane being blown out of the sky to make people believe that these threats are real.........even then, the conspiracy theorists will say it was an inside job.
So, in answer to your question Blue......you are an old sceptic.
on friday PRESIDENT OBAMA SAID, SO DID THE B.B.C., SO DID THE TIMES, SO DID THE TELEGRAPH, SO DID DAVID CAMERON THAT THE DEVICES CAME ON FLIGHTS OUT OF YEMEN AND THAT A KNOWN AL QAEDER YEMINI DEFECTOR NOW IN SAUDI ARABIA WAS THE SOURCE OF THE TIP OFF THAT LED TO THE PLOT BEING UNEARTHED ! the evolving story after that may involve qatar airlines claiming things to be different in order to counter provable disinformation !
it is well documented and in the public domain, (washington post, msnbc, cnn, sworn evidence of passengers) that the underwear bomber boarded at schipol airport without a passport, where a trial of body scanners was already taking place, accompanied by "a sharp dressed man" later confirmed by the f.b.i. (reuters and associated press)to be one of their agents and the bomber was filmed on the aircraft in flight by another man "for a protracted period of time" said a passenger witness. max, these are available facts. it is a fact that all images created by body scanners are saved, contrary to initial reports. it is a fact that the medical professions are unhappy about the level of x-rays emmitted by the machines and it is a fact that pre the incident the machines were in mass production. it is also a fact that members of the bush administration are shareholders of the company that produces them !
i for one am unhappy that security devices and procedures sold to us by the deliberate and managed creation of fear that restricts our freedoms, costs us time and money, potentially harms us and makes oodles of cash for the promoters of fear.
oooh panic, al c.i.a. qaeder have developed more sophisticated ways of getting us. quick, lets invade yemen where they have moved to. (entrance to the gulf). oh worry, not to worry, big strong obama and cameron will protect us. lets give up habeas corpus and keep our anti-terrorism act/patriot act. we gotta give up our liberties to protect our freedom.
Quote by Dave__Notts
tariq aziz is a christian, and an intellectual from the previous regime of a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, no contacts or ties with or osama bin liner, no weapons of mass deception and will be executed by the occupation selected and controlled puppets of iraq to bury and maintain his silence on matters that would incriminate bush, wolferwitz, cheney, blair, brown and many other lying bastards, for genocide.
Genocide? Are you sure that was the aim of the Coalition?
If you care to answer then don't give this cryptic nonsense please and just explain what you are saying.
Dave_Notts
cryptic nonesense ?
dave, with respect, please join up the dots...... weapons of mass destruction.....attack cyprus in 45 mins....terrorist training camps.......killing his own people......regime change.......chemical weapons.......al qaeder.....fostering terrorism.......connected to 9/11.......osama bin laden........afghanistan........war lords........poppy fields......iranians nuclear capability.......connected to.....reliable sources.....we got to invade to free the people....tyrants.....democracy.....uncivilised....they fear our freedoms....killing each other.....treating women badly......
goebbles would have been proud.
the purpose of the invasions and occupations of iraq and afghanistan, the destabilisation of pakistan and threats to iran and yemen are to control and extract the oil, gas and minerals concentrated in that part of the world (eurasia) and prevent the competing economies of china, russia and india from getting their hands on it to maintain anglo-american primacy in the world. in carrying out this foreign policy, millions have been killed and displaced, thousands of soldiers have been slaughtered.
ALL FOR PROFIT FOR THE FEW BUT NO BENEFIT FOR YOU, ME OR THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD.
yes we are blue. last week the head of b.a. says security measures at airports are superflous, aids of obama said months ago that nothing short of a 9/11 terror attack could get the democrates and him re-elected, the london times reported in july that alawaki had dinner with the head of the u.s. army at the pentagon months after 9/11.
alawaki is now number 1 of and is in yemen (yemen controls the entrance to the gulf) and, the yemen government made a statement on friday that no u.p.s. aircraft has flown out of yemen in the last week and there are no direct flights out of yemen to the u.k. !
funny how this terror alert comes within days of the u.s. mid term elections where the incumbent democrates are expected to loose. just like the underpants bomber at christmas preceded the rolling out of high resolution, high x-ray radiating body scanners at major airports ? we are being fed crap terror to keep us in fear, take away our rights in the interests of freedom and being sold the lie that the policy of foriegn wars is for peace ?
the war on terror is a war of terror for all the peoples of the world and pure goebles propaganda to subjugate us all. the wars and occupations of iraq, afghanistan, northern pakistan and likely yemen and iran are to control the oil, gas and minerals of that part of the world for anglo-american interests for profit and have nothing to do with the mythical creation of an evil international resourceful terrorist organisation led by an unaging suposedly ex c.i.a. asset holed up in a cave in afghanistan.
fortunately, even the x factor/football struck masses are beginning to wake up to the fact that they are being constantly spun a pack of lies.
alawaki is now number 1 of and is in yemen (yemen controls the entrance to the gulf) and, the yemen government made a statement on friday that no u.p.s. aircraft has flown out of yemen in the last week and there are no direct flights out of yemen to the u.k. !
funny how this terror alert comes within days of the u.s. mid term elections where the incumbent democrates are expected to loose. just like the underpants bomber at christmas preceded the rolling out of high resolution, high x-ray radiating body scanners at major airports ? we are being fed crap terror to keep us in fear, take away our rights in the interests of freedom and being sold the lie that the policy of foriegn wars is for peace ?
the war on terror is a war of terror for all the peoples of the world and pure goebles propaganda to subjugate us all. the wars and occupations of iraq, afghanistan, northern pakistan and likely yemen and iran are to control the oil, gas and minerals of that part of the world for anglo-american interests for profit and have nothing to do with the mythical creation of an evil international resourceful terrorist organisation led by an unaging suposedly ex c.i.a. asset holed up in a cave in afghanistan.
fortunately, even the x factor/football struck masses are beginning to wake up to the fact that they are being constantly spun a pack of lies.
if some of you could take the time to read brezinski's book "the grand chessboard" published in 1997, all would be revealed about british and american foriegn policy in the middle east since 1997.
all the lies and deceptions about terror, weapons of mass destruction, attack cyprus bases within 45 mins, 9/11 and al qaeder, taliban and osama bin laden, shoe bomber and underpants bomber, bringing regime change and democracy in the region, would collapse into the dustbin of history of lies and bullshit. research "policy for the new american century" and it will also become clear.
outside of the british and american mainstream media, the peoples of the world despise our governments for the destruction and mass killings of the people in the countries of the middle east and eurasia that contains the highest concentration of oil, gas and minerals on the planet that british and american interests must control to maintain anglo-american primacy in the world.
all this bullshit we are fed on and the latest being explosive material in ink cartridges in printers from yemen en route to america on the eve of congressional and senate elections when the incumbents are on their arses is too coincidental to be true.
the bankers in wall street and the city dont care a damn for human life and anyway, war is profitable.
all the lies and deceptions about terror, weapons of mass destruction, attack cyprus bases within 45 mins, 9/11 and al qaeder, taliban and osama bin laden, shoe bomber and underpants bomber, bringing regime change and democracy in the region, would collapse into the dustbin of history of lies and bullshit. research "policy for the new american century" and it will also become clear.
outside of the british and american mainstream media, the peoples of the world despise our governments for the destruction and mass killings of the people in the countries of the middle east and eurasia that contains the highest concentration of oil, gas and minerals on the planet that british and american interests must control to maintain anglo-american primacy in the world.
all this bullshit we are fed on and the latest being explosive material in ink cartridges in printers from yemen en route to america on the eve of congressional and senate elections when the incumbents are on their arses is too coincidental to be true.
the bankers in wall street and the city dont care a damn for human life and anyway, war is profitable.
tariq aziz is a christian, and an intellectual from the previous regime of a country that had nothing to do with 9/11, no contacts or ties with or osama bin liner, no weapons of mass deception and will be executed by the occupation selected and controlled puppets of iraq to bury and maintain his silence on matters that would incriminate bush, wolferwitz, cheney, blair, brown and many other lying bastards, for genocide.
Quote by Theladyisaminx
In a lot of the threads in here there are claim and counter claim about how much the previous Labour Gov. spent, or overspent, and the resulting huge dept now owed by this Country.
So a couple of questions, hopefully some clever people on here can answer them;
1, If this Country and most of Europe and America have such huge debts, who was rich enough to lend us / them those massive amounts of money.
2, How big would the UK debt have been / what would be the state of the nations finances, if the banking crisis hadn't happened. ie if the bankers had got it right instead of getting it wrong and needing umpteen billions to bail them out.
John
the first question is extremely relevent, the second is superfluous. the money/credit, never existed. it was created out of thin air. research money as debt.
i wish to change your question a little if i may be so rude.
1, if this country, most of europe, latin america, japan, africa and north america have such huge debts and governments can get central banks to PRINT money (inflation of the money supply), then who the phuck do we owe it to ? its a fuckin scam !
The debt is real it was all issued in Uk Bonds which are held mostly in the Middle East and China and by institutions in the UK.
We could just print more money but it would cause massive inflation because the pound would collapse.
The interest alone on the bonds means the treasury have to issue more bonds just the pay this.
The risk is people would stop buying UK Bonds and where would we get any money then?
This almost happened under Labour as the bonds were going to be downgraded, this is what happened in Greece and look at the state they are in.
So there are two solutions
1. payoff the debt creating more deposite and risk inflation
2. A mix of cutting spending, raising taxes to pay it off over many years.
Either way = PAYINGthe debt is NOT real, it was created out of thin air by banks at fractional reserve and whatever money is owed to whom is owed by the banks to one another !
1. pay off the debt creating more deposite and risk inflation ? poppycock ! INFLATION/DEBASEMENT OF THE CURRENCY is caused by an increase in the money supply ! PRINTING IT !
2. a mix of cutting spending, raising taxes to pay it off over many years ? RUBBISH, it can never be paid off and is never intended to be ! if the government cuts spending and raises taxes in an economic enviroment where lenders are not and cannot lend (to top up the money supply in circulation), demand will fall causing depression. when the private bank of england carried out quantatative easing to the tune of £200 billion (digitised or printed), it did so out of thin air ! and gave it to banks to fill balance sheets that were full of toxic debt. this credit, printed out of thin air, AT INTEREST, was assigned as debt, AT INTEREST, to the british tax payer !
this credit, AT INTEREST, never previously existed. this is the great fraud being carried out by private central banks around the world commited against the people of the world causing private debt to be socialised and passed on to the tax payers of the world.
governments (tax payers) are then ripped off again, not having sufficient funds in reserve, are forced again to raise funds on the international money markets, to sell/auction, bonds, gilts, treasuries etc and raise taxes and sell state assets/privatisation, AT INTEREST, to pay the debt.
having staved off bankruptcy and collapse temporarily by socialising their debt, the bankers can now pay themselves record bonuses from the sweat of the tax payers. the tax payers can suffer austerity and lose all their assets while the bankers enjoy plenty and think of the next big scam/ponzi scheme to rob us all.
Quote by Theladyisaminxthe politicians in westminster, regardless of political colour have absolutely no say in foreign or domestic policy. they are merely pawns or more like actors in the theatre that is the palace of westminster. just like the puppet obama with his "we are change" and then no change but more of the same.
Isn’t the state of this countries problems partly due to the fact of the conservative government being in power from 79-97 and saying all can have, mortgages boomed credit cards become more widely used. Banks then lent more people became more selfish and wanted, expected. Which drove the banks on more, they I believe caused the starting of the bubble, I don’t let labour off either, but I do believe they had no choice but to invest in the infrastructure Schools, Hospitals that were old grumbling and falling down.
I believe we are suffering now as a result of what both parties have contributed too so I can’t feel comfortable with either of these parties, they have both failed us and caused the problems we are all facing now.
Hopefully with two parties having to work together compromise as most relationship partnerships have to learn to do I feel is the only hope we have left, that they might find an more even balance.
what are you views?
it would have made absolutely no difference who had been elected, the agenda remains the same.
Quote by Geordiecpl2001
In a lot of the threads in here there are claim and counter claim about how much the previous Labour Gov. spent, or overspent, and the resulting huge dept now owed by this Country.
So a couple of questions, hopefully some clever people on here can answer them;
1, If this Country and most of Europe and America have such huge debts, who was rich enough to lend us / them those massive amounts of money.
2, How big would the UK debt have been / what would be the state of the nations finances, if the banking crisis hadn't happened. ie if the bankers had got it right instead of getting it wrong and needing umpteen billions to bail them out.
John
the first question is extremely relevent, the second is superfluous. the money/credit, never existed. it was created out of thin air. research money as debt.
i wish to change your question a little if i may be so rude.
1, if this country, most of europe, latin america, japan, africa and north america have such huge debts and governments can get central banks to PRINT money (inflation of the money supply), then who the phuck do we owe it to ? its a fuckin scam !
so a universal benefit will no longer be. but thats o.k. it dont affect me.
means test disability benefit. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut jobs seekers allowance and housing benefit. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
slash infrastructure projects. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut pensions and make us work till older. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
sack council workers and make cuts. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut soldiers wages. but thats o.k. i got soul but i aint a soldier.
start new wars, we can afford it. but thats o.k. i aint being bombed. yet.
create money out of thin air and give it to banks for a lendin. but thats o.k.
it dont affect me. yet.
but anyway, we gotta pay it back at interest and bankers gotta have bonuses and we gotta have austerity. but thats o.k.
it dont affect me. YET.
means test disability benefit. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut jobs seekers allowance and housing benefit. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
slash infrastructure projects. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut pensions and make us work till older. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
sack council workers and make cuts. but thats o.k. it dont affect me. yet.
cut soldiers wages. but thats o.k. i got soul but i aint a soldier.
start new wars, we can afford it. but thats o.k. i aint being bombed. yet.
create money out of thin air and give it to banks for a lendin. but thats o.k.
it dont affect me. yet.
but anyway, we gotta pay it back at interest and bankers gotta have bonuses and we gotta have austerity. but thats o.k.
it dont affect me. YET.
Quote by kentswingers777
yes kenty, it was all conspired by anglo american foreign policy makers in the early 1990's and is well documented in pnac (policy for the new american century) formulated by cheney, wolferwitz, rumsfeld and bush senior and planned by bzrezinski and kissenger as outlined in "the grand chessboard".
rather than dismiss my contribution as a "conspiracy theory", why not put it to the test of history and events and not what you have been led to believe by our honest politicians and truthfull media, you who saw through the "global warming" bollox. regards oh intelligent one.
Quote by gulsonroad30664both invasions deano form parts of the geostrategic plan to control oil/gas and mineral reserves in the richest deposit area of the planet which is eurasia.
I think.....the invasion of Afghanistan....in the light of 9/11 was something that was required. Terrorists were being trained there, and sent out to do spread the threat across the western world. had we not stoped this, they would have gone on to do more bigger and daring things !! I think we needed to curtail the exploits of the Taliban.
Iraq is totally differant. I think we rushed in.....and was more to do with Mr Bush's wish to finish off what his father started !! I think they thought it would be a push over....all the locals would welcome them with open arms, and they would be seen as conquering heroes. As we all know things didn't quite turn out that way. Ain't hindsight a wonderfull thing. I do think the removal of Saddam Hussian, has left the world a better place. What all investigations have concluded is the same, that no plan, for after the invasion was ever really thought out.
We can't now just say, right had enough we are off. We invaded this country, it is our duty to oversee a government of the peoples choice is in place, and upheld. We may not want to be, but think we will have a presence there for at least another 25 years or so.
all the bullshit we have been fed on since 9/11 (modern day pearl harbour) is clearly laid out chronologically in zibignew bzrezinski's 1997 book "the grand chessboard".
bzrezinski was an advisor to regan, carter, clinton and now obama. founding member of the trilateral commission and council on foreign relations and creator of the cia financed and trained "al quader", which as robin cook explained befor his untimely death, means data base in arabic.
so in the grand scheme of things (anglo-american primacy), iraq, afghanistan, uzbekistan, pakistan and iran are on the contrary, not totally different but one and the same. sorry deano, i thought you were cleverer than this. regards. whats more is
no iraqi or afghani was present or accused of the 9/11 attacks.
mohammed atta was accused of being the leader of the hi-jackers (a saudi citizen), they know this because they found his perfect condition green saudi passport at "ground zero"
the war on terror, if you ask iraqi's, afghani's, pakistani's or iranians, is a war of terror on them who, if you ask the pakistan isi or the indian intelligence services after mumbai, will tell you that the attacks in their countries were financed and controlled by british and american intelligence services.
we do not bring democracy or good governance to the region (how arrogant is that) but have overseen a thousand percent increase in opium/heroin production, abu grabe, millions displaced and hundreds of thousands killed and british and american forces military and civilian (mercenaries) will remain in the area for as long as it it necessary to extract the oil, gas and minerals and prevent china, india and russia from getting their hands on it.
it has absolutely nothing to do with world terrorism unless your on the recieving end of the invasions, occupations, cruise missiles, helcopter gunships, abrahams tanks, preditor drones and hellfire missiles.
i say again. read bzrezinski's book "the grand chessboard" written in 1997 and all will become absolutely clear.
Quote by deancannockboth invasions deano form parts of the geostrategic plan to control oil/gas and mineral reserves in the richest deposit area of the planet which is eurasia.
I think.....the invasion of Afghanistan....in the light of 9/11 was something that was required. Terrorists were being trained there, and sent out to do spread the threat across the western world. had we not stoped this, they would have gone on to do more bigger and daring things !! I think we needed to curtail the exploits of the Taliban.
Iraq is totally differant. I think we rushed in.....and was more to do with Mr Bush's wish to finish off what his father started !! I think they thought it would be a push over....all the locals would welcome them with open arms, and they would be seen as conquering heroes. As we all know things didn't quite turn out that way. Ain't hindsight a wonderfull thing. I do think the removal of Saddam Hussian, has left the world a better place. What all investigations have concluded is the same, that no plan, for after the invasion was ever really thought out.
We can't now just say, right had enough we are off. We invaded this country, it is our duty to oversee a government of the peoples choice is in place, and upheld. We may not want to be, but think we will have a presence there for at least another 25 years or so.
all the bullshit we have been fed on since 9/11 (modern day pearl harbour) is clearly laid out chronologically in zibignew bzrezinski's 1997 book "the grand chessboard".
bzrezinski was an advisor to regan, carter, clinton and now obama. founding member of the trilateral commission and council on foreign relations and creator of the cia financed and trained "al quader", which as robin cook explained befor his untimely death, means data base in arabic.
so in the grand scheme of things (anglo-american primacy), iraq, afghanistan, uzbekistan, pakistan and iran are on the contrary, not totally different but one and the same. sorry deano, i thought you were cleverer than this. regards.
Quote by kentswingers777international finance and banking broke this country and most others kenty or have you got amnesia ? p.s. there is nothing socialist about new labour or any other parliamentry puppets.
Maybe true Max but..........still lefty tree hugging Socialists, who were part of a Government that broke this country financially.
Of which we are all about to start paying for heavily.
As I said already......who cares?
Quote by browningyes you are browning. all government foreign aid is conditional. usually, the money has to be spent with british companies carrying out contracts for works or to buy local politicians/influence within a geostrategic plan.
Just seen on the news that the UK is to give another £70 million to the pakistani flood appeal, bringing the total amount donated by HM goverment to £134 million.
Let me see if ive got this right, apperently the countries skint and we have to cut back on spending, including axeing police officers, and yet we can still give £134 million to the flood appeal.
Am I missing something here? :sad:
no free lunches here or maybe a poisoned chalice ?
the ruling elite (men behind the curtain) are laughing even louder.
it was'nt the unions WORLDWIDE that lent credit created out of thin air (fractional reserve) at interest, to people who could'nt pay it back, packaged the loans up and resold them around the world to other greedy bastards, causing the banking system to collapse saved only by the taxpayers who now have to pay with austerity and job losses.
musta bin the unions faults in greece, ireland, portugal, france, iceland and britain. probably the united auto workers fault in the u.s. and i.g. metal in germany.
greedy bastards them phuckers in unions espech in them public services. they are all too small to save and not one of the too big to fails (big bonuses)
must be a lot of amnesia about.
it was'nt the unions WORLDWIDE that lent credit created out of thin air (fractional reserve) at interest, to people who could'nt pay it back, packaged the loans up and resold them around the world to other greedy bastards, causing the banking system to collapse saved only by the taxpayers who now have to pay with austerity and job losses.
musta bin the unions faults in greece, ireland, portugal, france, iceland and britain. probably the united auto workers fault in the u.s. and i.g. metal in germany.
greedy bastards them phuckers in unions espech in them public services. they are all too small to save and not one of the too big to fails (big bonuses)
must be a lot of amnesia about.
Quote by essex34m
Then they will say it was suicide. :twisted:
Thats just for British UN weapons inspectors...
no kenty, thats for anyone. wether it be hanging from a london bridge, car crash in a tunnel, overboard off one yaght, overdose and wrists slit in the woods or sports bag in the bin.
it would be worth it if you lot would wake up. regards
Quote by kentswingers777
Think this one could rumble on a bit Blue.
Of course there was human error, they were not up to the job or.....not fit for purpose.
Brown was just a bumbling buffoon handed the reigns of power through the back door. Nobody dared to oppose him when he wanted the leadership as all the other candidates lost their bottle.
Blair on the other hand is a different animal entirely.
You only have to listen to the army top brass to know the Government let down our troops. They sent them into war under equipped to do the job they were told to do.
Whatever Blair says most of us know he sent us into war with the evidence about as flimsy as a crisp packet, and on the basis is a liar and a fraud.
Most of us know he did it to please the Yanks and in particular Bush, which in those circumstances is unforgivable.
I have spoken to many soldiers who have fought in Iraq and Afghanistan and they all say they were well underfunded, which is the fault of Blair.........period.
Time will tell all about this conflict in years to come, but I know that he sent our troops into war underfunded, which affected their ability to do the job, and also in my opinion caused soldiers their deaths and injuries.
On that basis I believe he should have been brought to task, but he never will as the British establishment have done a huge cover up to protect him from any prosecutions.
The inquiry where Blair gave evidence was very well manufactured.....he was well briefed in what to say, and to me I believe he lied his arse off in that inquiry....I am not alone in thinking this.
For me one of the most sickening things I have ever seen in politics, is the fact that Blair sent our troops to war, underfunded and unable to do the job to the best of their abilities, our troops are dying and getting seriously injured in what I believe was always just to satisfy Bush. Then when he quit office he then became a peace envoy, yes the word peace sticks in my throat, to the Middle East.
How and why this was allowed to happen is one of the reasons that I believe politicians at World level are corrupt, and it is all about doing things for ya mates.
It is about as corrupt as Obama getting the Nobel peace prize....for doing what exactly???
I am suprised that Bush was not awarded that accolade to be honest, as it is always about dodgy hand shakes and dodgy deals done behind closed doors. The Nobel prize has been hugely devalued for giving it to a man that had done nothing other than win the USA presidency,purely because he was black.....that's put the cat amongst the pigeons now.
there was no human errors here.
british and american troops were sent to iraqafghanistanbannanistan for economic reasons. and they are still there and will remain there be it regular troops or hundreds of thousands of private contractors (mercenaries) until the oil, gas and minerals have been extracted and the local populacies pacified (bombed back to the dark ages) and to prevent the chinese, russians and asians aquiring those reserves.
the geo-economic necessity to maintain anglo-american primacy in the world necessitates control over the largest deposits of oil, gas and minerals which are concentrated in this area of the planet. the grand chess players at work here could'nt give a fuck about wether or not the economic refugees that join their armies are well equipted enough or killed and wounded.
it would not make the slightest difference to foreign policy who is selected to act their part in the theatre of the palace of westminster.
weapons of mass deception or the myth of al cia quader led by the illusive unaging all seeing osama bin liner are diversions to get the dumbed down servile public to accept the genocide taking place in the name of "the war on terror". bullshit. it is a permanent war of terror for the inhabitants of iraq, afghanistan and next iran, not to minimise the suffering of the palestinians in the largest prison camp on earth.
wake the fuck up peeps.
Quote by Fun-For-Us
Unfortunately I took this vaccine and have been serverely ill ever since. I have since found out that this hoax was only stopped when two european countrys tested and found it "Unsafe"
i'm sorry you took it fun. the hoax was promoted by big pharma in the interest of big profits. the amazing thing is how much influence money has on the u.n. to get the w.h.o. to change the criteria of what constitutes a pandemic and so press governments to spend tax payers money on a fraud. just like the climate change fraud and weapons of mass deception crap for the carbon taxes and the oil and gas pipelines in eurasia, we keep getting shafted.
try to be more vigilant and aware in future. vaccines should never be trusted. there is a greater agenda. good health is the strongest barrier to illness. exercise and good eating are primary. regards
Quote by Max777
funny init.
a man boards a plane in amsterdam with something explosive in his undies, accompanied by a "sharp dressed man" according to numerous other passengers, with no passport according to the f.b.i. in detroit. he was filmed throughout the journey by the "sharp dressed man" according to the passengers seated near them and when the aircraft reaches journey's end, the odd couple are escorted away while all the other passengers are bundled into a holding area with their hand luggage and held for over an hour on the pretext of a security alert. within the same day, christmas day, the press is reporting various versions of the event, culminating in the story of the explosive knickers and therefore the need for "body scanners at airports" which are already in place at most airports along with eye scanners. ever since, the press has been ranting about the british and american embassies closing in yemen due to terrorist ciaquaeder threats, connections with iranian funding, dirty rotten iranians surpressing democracy movements in iran, islamic uk march through wooton bassett, etc etc.
expect a continual ramping up of islamaphobia culminating in a big event to justify some increased military action and further erosion of civil liberty's at home to "protect our freedom". just like the dimwit trying to set fire to his shoe lace, "hot pants is a patsy".
and i dont want me bollox bombarded with x rays either, but i may have been wrong
You may well have been wrong on all these issues Gulson as of yet, you haven't been proved right!!
all these different issues is the issue max
Quote by gulsonroad30664
funny init.
a man boards a plane in amsterdam with something explosive in his undies, accompanied by a "sharp dressed man" according to numerous other passengers, with no passport according to the f.b.i. in detroit. he was filmed throughout the journey by the "sharp dressed man" according to the passengers seated near them and when the aircraft reaches journey's end, the odd couple are escorted away while all the other passengers are bundled into a holding area with their hand luggage and held for over an hour on the pretext of a security alert. within the same day, christmas day, the press is reporting various versions of the event, culminating in the story of the explosive knickers and therefore the need for "body scanners at airports" which are already in place at most airports along with eye scanners. ever since, the press has been ranting about the british and american embassies closing in yemen due to terrorist ciaquaeder threats, connections with iranian funding, dirty rotten iranians surpressing democracy movements in iran, islamic uk march through wooton bassett, etc etc.
expect a continual ramping up of islamaphobia culminating in a big event to justify some increased military action and further erosion of civil liberty's at home to "protect our freedom". just like the dimwit trying to set fire to his shoe lace, "hot pants is a patsy".
and i dont want me bollox bombarded with x rays either, but i may have been wrong
