davygravy hi mate you may want to read this:
http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/swingers-forum/viewtopic/48119.html
They don't appear to have posted since this kicked off so don't hold your breath for a reply.
All the best anyway :thumbup:
Plus you may want to take a butchers at the site's AUP regarding your pic <-------------
Good luck anyway mate.
hayes,
You do realise that you've posted your phone number on an open forum viewable to all and sundry? You can probably expect some crank calls tonight m8.
You might also want to check: http://www.swingingheaven.co.uk/main/aup.html and specifically the 4th point re posting phone no's.
Having read the story it would seem that there could have been breeches of the Press Complaints Commission's code of conduct:
1) Under Clandestine devices and subterfuge they say "The press must not seek to obtain or publish material acquired by using hidden cameras or clandestine listening devices. " - the photo's they've used clearly look as though they used some sort of hidden camera.
2) Under Privacy they say "Everyone is entitled to respect for his or her private and family life, home, health and correspondence, including digital communications. Editors will be expected to justify intrusions into any individual's private life without consent. It is unacceptable to photograph individuals in private places without their consent. Note - Private places are public or private property where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy." - I'm not familiar with the place in the article but would assume that a private club is somewhere where folks should expect a reasonable degree of privacy.
I'd have thought that the folks in the pics could have some sort of basis for making a complaint here. Of course whether the PCC would ever view this as any wrong doing by the Notw is another matter.